Part 2
The following week, Mr. Hitchens politely acknowledged our communication in his column. But there wasn�t a scintilla of comment from him to correct, ease, or clarify his misunderstanding. In fact, he continued his diatribe.
I felt increasingly sorry for the MP as I had people come up to me during the week, saying how appalled they were at what he said. One man told me that he wanted to �punch his lights out.� And no matter how I tried to correct the misinformation, at least with the people I met, their opinions had already been formed.
When I told my son of a couple of the encounters I had, he reminded me of Uncle David and added, �You�ve just met some more of Britain�s Daily Veilers.� I told him I thought that was probably a bit harsh. Willem clarified his comment by saying it was the Mail that put the veil over the eyes of its readers, not the readers doing themselves.
So, whether it�s �Guardianistas� or �Veilers,� I suppose no one wants to be tagged.
Read: Thugs must learn that good can mean nasty
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/artic les/columnists/mailonsunday.html?in_article_id =433735&in_page_id=1791
Following week:
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/artic les/columnists/mailonsunday.html?in_article_id =435427&in_page_id=1791