Part 2
Over the past few weeks there has been numerous references made to Trip Advisor and one other review site for travel. Clearly, some of the travellers who had made queries were novitiates in travel. And it was with this thought, that I felt it important to share this fair caveat about these type sites. I believed, and I still believe that there�s a number of people who would never imagine that some of these sites may be �spiked� by the vendor. With restaurant guides, it happens so regularly now, that some media outlets refuse to publish emailed reviews.
Again, I need to apologise. In this instance, I�m at a loss as to what you�re referring to about when you wrote �Why if someone only has 2 days would they want to leave the city and go somewhere else - unless they do not want to be in that city? �
I �think� you�re referring to the person who asked about travel to shikoku? Perhaps I misunderstood. It�s certainly possible. But as I understand it, the individual is going to be in Japan, presumably one of the major cities, and wishes to visit shikoku. Again, if I�ve misunderstood what this person has asked about, I�m sure they will point out that I�m either mistaken or an idiot. Again, constructive criticism is always valuable.
JK, I again want to be clear. It would never be my intent, or a composite of my personality to wish to discount feelings or statements made by another. You are correct: I am fluid in my writing. There are occasions when I make reference to childhood and there are instances where what I�ve offered may possibly not have relevance. Should you find this to be the case, I hope you, as well as the person who posted the initial question will forgive me. I�m sure the submitter will clearly see that I�m either an idiot or have completely lost the plot in my verbosity.
Nevertheless, I again apologise to you for having upset you.
Fr Bill