I often find myself screaming in rage at the tv when this programme is on.
''The banned driver, who is driving without insurance, a licence, in a stolen car, and under the influence of anything he can get hold of, is banned for 12 months''.
Forgive me for sounding thick, but they clearly don't care about driving without a licence, so why bother banning them again?
Surely to god it would be more beneficial to chop a foot off on each of the first two offences, then move onto their hands?
Then ban them from claiming benefits - scumbags.
Can't the court choose to hand out drugs that have been cut with rat poison? Should see a rapid drop in offences