Shopping & Style2 mins ago
Prince Harry's cover blown in Afghanistan
Prince Harry's planned tour of Iraq was cancelled last year for fears that he would put himself and his colleagues at serious risk. However, it has now been revealed that Harry has spent the past 10 weeks serving in Helmand Province. The whole deployment was kept a secret as part of a media blackout deal agreed across the UK, this was done in order to prevent details getting through to the Taliban and which may put Harry and his comrades at risk even more risk. There are now discussions as to whether or not he should be withdrawn and brought home. What do you think? Should he be allowed to stay or is it too risky?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by AB Asks. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.As advised, Harry is on his way home because of the security issues involved in keeping him on the front line.
Gordon brown says " ...the country owes him a debt of gratitude..."
Why?
Harry lives an utterly privelidged life purely by an accident of birth. He is not sufficiently accademic or blessed with enough charisma or personality to make him useful as any kind of ambassador, so he chooses to play at being a soldier - and for all his wind and bluster that is what he is doing.
I think the entire notion of being a soldier is morally dubious - the fact that the Prime Minister chooses only to single out the higest profile one demonstrates the increasing bankrupt moral stance of the UK government abroad.
Of course Harry shouldn't be a Taliban target - bu he's not alone is he?
Gordon brown says " ...the country owes him a debt of gratitude..."
Why?
Harry lives an utterly privelidged life purely by an accident of birth. He is not sufficiently accademic or blessed with enough charisma or personality to make him useful as any kind of ambassador, so he chooses to play at being a soldier - and for all his wind and bluster that is what he is doing.
I think the entire notion of being a soldier is morally dubious - the fact that the Prime Minister chooses only to single out the higest profile one demonstrates the increasing bankrupt moral stance of the UK government abroad.
Of course Harry shouldn't be a Taliban target - bu he's not alone is he?
Harry joined the army...therefore he should expect to be deployed as necessary. However, the fact that he was there at all would obviously put his comrades at more risk than already exists. It was very selfish of him to go and put his comrades in that extra danger.
Of course, we should be used to the so called elite getting what they want no matter the consequences.
However, what concerns me more is the fact that the UK press 'agreed' to a media blackout on the subject (although I do realise that this would protect his comrades as well).
I am left wondering what other media black outs have happened that we do not know about.
Of course, we should be used to the so called elite getting what they want no matter the consequences.
However, what concerns me more is the fact that the UK press 'agreed' to a media blackout on the subject (although I do realise that this would protect his comrades as well).
I am left wondering what other media black outs have happened that we do not know about.
I can hardly believe it. I hardly ever pose questions on here and rarely respond but I must say I agree with all of the above (hope nobody has added since I last looked!!) Is there anybody who really believes that Harry would be permitted to place himself in danger? One can almost hear the media out there, "Excuse me, sir, can you please try to look a little more menacing" "Can we run that once more" "Get that Afghan to walk past in the background". What a load of old cobblers. Surrounded by Ghurkas to ensure his safety. It was the same for Andrew in the Falklands ... flew a helicopter once!! One thing that is fairly certain is that the troops in close proximity to Harry would be issued with sufficient uniform and protective gear, for the benefit of the media. As was suggested by brionon, I think it is highly likely he got fed up with playing war and rather than be humiliated by returning to the UK after such a short spell, it has been made to look as though there is no other choice. He will be much happier being thrown out of nightclubs in London.
tiggerblue10 - Yes, quite amazing that this was kept quiet. Maybe the whole thing, including the disclosure, is all part of an elaborate scam to worm their way back into the public's hearts. They are very cunning you know and when you take into account all the resources at their disposal, nothing should surprise us. The next time Harry is seen in uniform, CinC of the world, he will be sporting a couple of dozen medals.
While I agree it does seem to be just one large publicity stunt, at least it has gone along way to highlight to the British public that there is in fact a war not only in Iraq but also in a place called Afghanistan.
Another thing it highlighted was the fact that Prince Charles and Prince William were in attendance at RAF Brize Norton to see Prince Harry return to England. That is more than be said for them when all those other soldiers arrive back walking, on stretchers or in boxes.
What does frighten me however is the fact that our establishment has the power to silence our media for whatever reason they deem necessary.
Another thing it highlighted was the fact that Prince Charles and Prince William were in attendance at RAF Brize Norton to see Prince Harry return to England. That is more than be said for them when all those other soldiers arrive back walking, on stretchers or in boxes.
What does frighten me however is the fact that our establishment has the power to silence our media for whatever reason they deem necessary.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.