Bimbo, that�s a fine idea if everyone has the same speed limiter, but supposing Mr Volvo is pootling along at 68mph and needs to speed up to just over 70 to overtake Mr Lorry, when Mr Focus is hurtling along the outside lane at 90. If Mr Volvo�s limiter suddenly kicks in, would that not create a worse situation? I agree though, there is no need for a road car to be able to go faster than say 90-100mph.
Speeding is an offence, and there are really no excuses. I think many people feel a bit miffed when they get the same fine and penalties for going 33 in a 30, as does someone going 50 in a 30 or the sports stars who get off on a technicality. Also, the cameras were originally meant specifically for troublesome spots, but with the glut of them at various junctures people now feel that they are installed for financial gain rather than any safety consideration.
I got 3 points for doing 44 in a 40 on a duel carriageway at 4am at the bottom of a flyover where cones and a temporary camera had been placed overnight. I was mightily peeved, but then I had to accept that I was exceeding the stated speed and as intended it has focussed my driving habits considerably.