ChatterBank2 mins ago
Liability after sale
1 Answers
I recently sold my car and sent off the V5 form and received the confirmation letter from DVLA. I then rang my insurance company to cancel; they then sent me a form to cancel. My question is that the car was involved in an accident between me selling and the insurance company processing my cancellation. They are now trying to claim the excess on my policy sating they are liable under the RTA, can they get the money from me?
Answers
Only 1 answer
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Macmonster. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
They shouldn;t be able to get money from you, but there is a really stupid part of the Road Traffic Act that we have to abide to.
If your certificate of insurance has not been retruned to the insurer, and there is no other insurance in force on your vehicle, then if it is involve din an accident with the new owner, then technically your insurer may be liable due to the outstanding certificate - stupid I know. Not entitrely sure of the in's and out's as I don't work on liability, but that's the basics behind it.
However, you shouldn't be liable for this, and realistically, your insurer should pass this info on to the third party insurer and tell them to contact the new owner directly for any monies owing.
Same thing applies with stolen cars - if the thief is identitifed, then the insurer is held liable, and has to attempt to claim the money back from the thief. If the thief is unidentified, then there is no liability on the insurer under the road traffic act.
There are probably people out there who could explain it better (New Judge?) and hopefully set anything I've got wrong straight, but I'm pretty certain I'm on the ball here.
If your certificate of insurance has not been retruned to the insurer, and there is no other insurance in force on your vehicle, then if it is involve din an accident with the new owner, then technically your insurer may be liable due to the outstanding certificate - stupid I know. Not entitrely sure of the in's and out's as I don't work on liability, but that's the basics behind it.
However, you shouldn't be liable for this, and realistically, your insurer should pass this info on to the third party insurer and tell them to contact the new owner directly for any monies owing.
Same thing applies with stolen cars - if the thief is identitifed, then the insurer is held liable, and has to attempt to claim the money back from the thief. If the thief is unidentified, then there is no liability on the insurer under the road traffic act.
There are probably people out there who could explain it better (New Judge?) and hopefully set anything I've got wrong straight, but I'm pretty certain I'm on the ball here.
Only 1 answer
