Channel 5 with Mark Wright.

[Lisa1983]

He has just said "He was turned on by a skantidly (sp) clad picture of a sexy girl in the paper but when he read down the page the girl was only 15 and he felt physically sick as to what his thoughts were". Where do we draw the line with young girls and these pictures? How would you feel if this were you be it a boy or a girl?

[spaced]

this is why we live amongst perverts, rapists and paedophiles, as these pictures are too readily available.

[Lisa1983]

Yes I get what you mean spaced. Why can't the publishers of these pictures be fined, the girl is obviously under 16 as they printed her age. They knew what a man's reaction would of been to such a picture? I would of been mortified if i'd been oggling a picture of a guy and he turned out to be underage!!!

[Ethel]

This is probably the photo:

http://tinyurl.com/6azqkx

She'd look much the same at 17 or 18, I think.

It is not the same as being sexually attracted to an obviously underage girl in school uniform or childish clothes, doing childish things.

A paedophile wouldn't be attracted to the girl in this photo in this pose - see looks far too 'knowing' and is far from the innocent child paedophiles are drawn to.

[Ethel]

Sam Fox was 16 when she first appeared topless in the Sun. I don't recall that photo being labelled as a target for paedophiles.

That was 25 years ago

[spaced]

things have changed Ethel, alot since the 70's/80's

[pastafreak]

It is a beautiful photo....but DEFINATELY WRONG to take ann publish a photo of this sort of a 15 year old!

[Ethel]

Yes they have, Spaced. Kids and young people are far more aware of their rights - and are far less likely to be exploited.

Naive they ain't.

[tigerlily11]

Well 15 or not she looks like she needs a good meal or two. She looks like a corpse. She does, I have to say look 15.
Am I right in thinking this is the same photographer who got up the queens nose while taking pictures of her? Something about wanting her to ramove her crown.
Had the miss fortune of seeing the Hanna Montana show.
Good grief no wonder Americas youth have so many problems if this is what passes a childrens entertainment.
Back in the time of Sam Fox perverts were a nasty part of life that was often swept under the rug and ignored. But she was 16 and the law says thats ok.
Didn't this girls agent or parents think that this was to young for their child or client to be having pictures like this done?