ChatterBank1 min ago
48 Questions
16 Answers
Would it have been better for Kate McCann to have answered these 48 questions, if not all, which ones would you have liked to hear the answers to?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-104163 5/The-48-questions-Kate-McCann-wouldnt-answer- -did.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-104163 5/The-48-questions-Kate-McCann-wouldnt-answer- -did.html
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.On the BBC new today, there was a report that the girl was seen being carried on the night of her disappearance by her father.
The eye witness evidence was discounted by Portuguese police because he was at the bar with his friends at the time.
This has come to light as the evidence has been released.
I don't suppose we will ever know what happened.
The eye witness evidence was discounted by Portuguese police because he was at the bar with his friends at the time.
This has come to light as the evidence has been released.
I don't suppose we will ever know what happened.
In answer to Gromit's post, I think they were 48 perfectly reasonable questions, given that the first suspects in any child abduction case are usually the parents or immediate carers.
I do not think that the child's parents murdered her, neither do I believe they know where she is. What I do think is that, apart from leaving the kids unattended, they were up to something with their 'friends' that night that they'd rather wasn't public knowledge, and that all those 'friends' have very carefully worked out stories together to make one verifiable one.
I don't think this cover up was the direct cause of the child's disappearance, but I do think it's jeopardised the investigation. Sooner or later, someone's going to slip up, though, and the press will have another field day.
I do not think that the child's parents murdered her, neither do I believe they know where she is. What I do think is that, apart from leaving the kids unattended, they were up to something with their 'friends' that night that they'd rather wasn't public knowledge, and that all those 'friends' have very carefully worked out stories together to make one verifiable one.
I don't think this cover up was the direct cause of the child's disappearance, but I do think it's jeopardised the investigation. Sooner or later, someone's going to slip up, though, and the press will have another field day.
I think these questions would have been reasonable at the start of the investigation. However true to incompetant form the Portugees police failed to do it right.
The police over there are (well) known to 'extract' confessions from people and had done so in a similar case. Those questions would not of helped in the investigation as it was too late. It is easy to say they should have answered them but when you become so frustrated at someones ability to do their job it is understandable that eventually you give them nothing.
Remember they had lost their daughter, seen the police fail utterly in thier duty, were being lied to and about and were then being treated very badly. I wonder why they didn't think to help....
The police over there are (well) known to 'extract' confessions from people and had done so in a similar case. Those questions would not of helped in the investigation as it was too late. It is easy to say they should have answered them but when you become so frustrated at someones ability to do their job it is understandable that eventually you give them nothing.
Remember they had lost their daughter, seen the police fail utterly in thier duty, were being lied to and about and were then being treated very badly. I wonder why they didn't think to help....