Crosswords1 min ago
Unfathomable joke in the Guardian
9 Answers
This was printed in Simon Hoggart's column in last Saturday's Guardian. I just don't get it. It's probably very simple and I'm missing the obvious, but could someone please explain it to me:
Andropov is going to visit Poland, so they decide on a gift to the Polish party leader, a painting titled Lenin In Poland. So they get an artist, Cohen. 'But Lenin never visited Poland,' he points out. 'Never mind, get on with it,' they tell him.
"Finally Cohen produces the picture. It shows a man and a woman in bed together. The apparatchiks are appalled. 'What on earth is that?' they demand. Cohen explains. 'The man is Trotsky. The woman is Lenin's wife, Krupskya.'
"'And where is Lenin?'
"'Why, Lenin is in Poland.'"
Andropov is going to visit Poland, so they decide on a gift to the Polish party leader, a painting titled Lenin In Poland. So they get an artist, Cohen. 'But Lenin never visited Poland,' he points out. 'Never mind, get on with it,' they tell him.
"Finally Cohen produces the picture. It shows a man and a woman in bed together. The apparatchiks are appalled. 'What on earth is that?' they demand. Cohen explains. 'The man is Trotsky. The woman is Lenin's wife, Krupskya.'
"'And where is Lenin?'
"'Why, Lenin is in Poland.'"
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikeymike99. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Well, I suppose the point is, they wanted him to paint a picture of Lenin in Poland tho' he never went there and he painted a picture of Trotsky in bed with Krupskya tho' that never happened. Presumably a reference to the fact that politicians never let an inconvenient truth get in the way of a good story
Thanks Whitehill but I'm not totally convinced. For that to work it has to be very obvious that Krupskya never slept with Trotsky which it certainly not the case. In fact, for all anyone knows, maybe they did sleep together. For example if the picture was of a logical impossibility ( let's say a fish flying an airplane) then the punchline might just work. But still not really. And it would still be an incredibly weak joke which no one in their right mind would print. Maybe there's a line missing.
The (scant) humour that I derive from this joke is from the predicament in which the artist is placed (Lenin was never in Poland so he doesn't want to paint the picture) and how he gets around it. Instead he imagines what might have happened if Lenin had gone to Poland (Trotsky gets into bed with Lenin's wife) and depicts that scene instead so he gets around his dilemma.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.