Quizzes & Puzzles14 mins ago
David Cameron.
14 Answers
Isn't he a nice traditional English" chap?
I hope he is our next Prime Minister.
Do you?
I hope he is our next Prime Minister.
Do you?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Abdulmajid. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
You can hardly get more English than this, can you?
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/02_1/Cam eronEton_600x539.jpg
Look at what he's wearing. Of course he should lead us. He's better than us commoners.
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/02_1/Cam eronEton_600x539.jpg
Look at what he's wearing. Of course he should lead us. He's better than us commoners.
The composition of snake oil medicines varies markedly between products.
Snake oil sold in San Francisco's Chinatown in 1989 was found to contain:
* 75% unidentified carrier material, including camphor
* 25% oil from Chinese water snakes, itself consisting of:
o 20% eicosapentaenic acid (EPA) - an omega 3 derivative
o 48% myristic acid (14:0)
o 10% stearic acid (18:0)
o 14% oleic acid (18:1ω9)
o 7% linoleic acid (18:2ω6) plus arachidonic acid (20:4ω6)
Given Dr. Richard Kunin's 1989 analysis[4], it appears that the Chinese snake oil made from Chinese water snakes is very high in EPA. This substance is known to be a pain reliever, as EPAs are absorbed through the skin and are the parent of the series 3 prostaglandins which inhibit the production of pro-inflammatory series 2 prostaglandins, and the Chinese snake oil products may contain up to 4% of it. Snake oil does not have the dubious reputation in China that it has in the US and elsewhere in the Western world, and it is used widely in traditional Chinese medicine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_oil
So around 1 billion Chinese will agree with WardMinter?
Snake oil sold in San Francisco's Chinatown in 1989 was found to contain:
* 75% unidentified carrier material, including camphor
* 25% oil from Chinese water snakes, itself consisting of:
o 20% eicosapentaenic acid (EPA) - an omega 3 derivative
o 48% myristic acid (14:0)
o 10% stearic acid (18:0)
o 14% oleic acid (18:1ω9)
o 7% linoleic acid (18:2ω6) plus arachidonic acid (20:4ω6)
Given Dr. Richard Kunin's 1989 analysis[4], it appears that the Chinese snake oil made from Chinese water snakes is very high in EPA. This substance is known to be a pain reliever, as EPAs are absorbed through the skin and are the parent of the series 3 prostaglandins which inhibit the production of pro-inflammatory series 2 prostaglandins, and the Chinese snake oil products may contain up to 4% of it. Snake oil does not have the dubious reputation in China that it has in the US and elsewhere in the Western world, and it is used widely in traditional Chinese medicine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_oil
So around 1 billion Chinese will agree with WardMinter?
To be honest, I find it a little depressing that people actually have preferences based solely on whether the candidate is a 'nice English chap'.
On Cameron, I don't trust him. I've heard him described as 'Blair in a blue suit' and that sounds pretty accurate for me. He's only now being looked on favourably because he's had the good fortune to stand opposite a lethargic and deeply unpopular government.
Cameron does, however, have some good people around him in the shadow cabinet (Hague being a good example) so they do have that plus. So I guess it would all depend on Cameron's leadership style.
Next election is really a selection between two bad candidates (I'd say Brown is better-intentioned than Cameron but it's kind of outweighed by his weak govt and his inability to rise to the premiership).
On Cameron, I don't trust him. I've heard him described as 'Blair in a blue suit' and that sounds pretty accurate for me. He's only now being looked on favourably because he's had the good fortune to stand opposite a lethargic and deeply unpopular government.
Cameron does, however, have some good people around him in the shadow cabinet (Hague being a good example) so they do have that plus. So I guess it would all depend on Cameron's leadership style.
Next election is really a selection between two bad candidates (I'd say Brown is better-intentioned than Cameron but it's kind of outweighed by his weak govt and his inability to rise to the premiership).
-- answer removed --