as a tset of teh theroy

[danglee]

Can you mkae a snetecne up wtih all the wrods seplt wronlgy and poelpe can sitll udnersatnd it ?

[Sachs]

You just proved your theory, yes!

[know-noknow]

that's what we normally do leg

[daniela31]

I agree with no kno.
There are quite a few that do that already on this site.

Or

they

type

like

this.

:-)

[sir.prize]

i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs forwrad it.

[sir.prize]

danglee - sorry I submitted the above. Didn't realise you have it in another thread.

[danglee]

lol sir pirez




lmao

[mrs.chappie]

On, ton me.