Title Builder Beta See instructions

Welcome to Title Builder Beta.

This small piece of kit is designed to make building your Quiz, Crossword or Puzzle question more effective. It should make finding your question easier for others and, the easier it is to find, the more likely someone is to answer it!

To build an easy to find question title simply select the paper and quiz, enter the quiz number if relevant and fill in the Publication Date. Once you’re happy click “Build Title” and the information should populate the Title field. Fill in the final required details of your question as you normally would, and click submit.

As this is a Beta we only have a limited number of papers and quizzes listed. If you think your favourite Quiz, Crossword or Puzzle should be listed here don’t hesitate to contact us.

Remember: You do not have to use the title builder - simply enter the title and question as you normally would and click submit!

Paper & Quiz:

Loading data...

Quiz Number:

Publication Date:

number puzzle

tjs | 23:34 Sun 28th Sep 2008 | Quizzes & Puzzles

14 Answers

can anyone tell me how you can make 490 using the numbers 100 75 9 3 3 2 only once each

Link words

enjoyable

Answers

1 to 14 of 14

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by tjs. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

johnalex

Please clarify numbers, using commas. Thanks, ja

tjs

Question Author

100, 75, 9, 3, 3, 2

ladyalex

Best I can do is 489
or 491 if you have to use all of the numbers

tjs

Question Author

thanks for trying, we can only get 491 also

ladyalex

happy to help, sorry to to have solved it.
:-))

ladyalex

Sorry, too late for me , cannot type at this hour. What I meant to say was, 'sorry not to have solved it'
:-((

thehost

100 + 75 - 9 = 164
x 3
= 492 - 2 = 490

badlad

Very good thehost but 100=75-9=166

badlad

that should be 100+75-9=166

johnalex

Weren't we supposed to be using two 3's (each one once) ? This is why I asked for clarification, thinking perhaps you meant 33 or 32. Wasted about an hour, using 3 as a cube, etc. ☻ja