Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Is This Right ?
14 Answers
So , you put your sobs , in a foreign bank , outside of the protection of the British Financial regulatory system .
The bank rolls over on it's back .
You come running to the Government ( the rest of us ) to bail you out .
Why should we ?
The bank rolls over on it's back .
You come running to the Government ( the rest of us ) to bail you out .
Why should we ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by BertiWooster. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Alistair Darling pledge was:
"We are pursuing Iceland and we will pursue it vigorously to make sure that we get the money due to us back.
"But, in the meantime, I am going to be able to help those savers who would otherwise have to look to Iceland to get their money back. I am prepared to stand behind them and to stand behind the depositors."
Which seems like a sensible approach. The Government will lean on the Icelandic Government to get the money back, but in the meantime, help anyone who this affects.
"We are pursuing Iceland and we will pursue it vigorously to make sure that we get the money due to us back.
"But, in the meantime, I am going to be able to help those savers who would otherwise have to look to Iceland to get their money back. I am prepared to stand behind them and to stand behind the depositors."
Which seems like a sensible approach. The Government will lean on the Icelandic Government to get the money back, but in the meantime, help anyone who this affects.
Yes , but these savers are going to get ALL their money back - not limited to the 50k for people guranteed under the British regulatory system ; - when they knew , in this case that , the Icelandic government , was supposed to gurantee a percentage of the amount of money in their accounts .
So isn't that the risk they took ?
As for the Government getting the money back - Well , lets hope so - but I wouldn't bet too many ' sobs' on it .
So isn't that the risk they took ?
As for the Government getting the money back - Well , lets hope so - but I wouldn't bet too many ' sobs' on it .
-- answer removed --
An answer on another forum:
Icesave was a UK "branch" of Landsbanki; meanwhile Heritable was a UK "subsidiary" of the same Landsbanki.
Makes a difference, apparently, as Heritable were fully covered by UK regs while Icesave's deposit protection arrangements were partly external.
Reykjavik seems to have mis-spoken itself last night (translation issues), upsetting Darling by saying they weren't paying up. They've now put out a fairly grovelly statement saying they will pay their share, and may even find enough to cover all of Icesave deposits.
Icesave was a UK "branch" of Landsbanki; meanwhile Heritable was a UK "subsidiary" of the same Landsbanki.
Makes a difference, apparently, as Heritable were fully covered by UK regs while Icesave's deposit protection arrangements were partly external.
Reykjavik seems to have mis-spoken itself last night (translation issues), upsetting Darling by saying they weren't paying up. They've now put out a fairly grovelly statement saying they will pay their share, and may even find enough to cover all of Icesave deposits.