So Dot is back ...

[joggerjayne]

... according to the Ed.

Yaaayyyyy !!!

[Rosetta]

JJ, I really do think you are are ace, but I don't agree with you here. Dot was still able to post under another alias so was not deprived of her rights. She wasn't in effect banned.
I think you have been sidetraked.

[dotovaposted]

awww Jayne was only having a laugh, don;t have a pop at her for it

I might be posting in a back up id but it is not my name, for some insanely odd reason i like to use my own id not an artificial one, never have, part of the problem has been the slow submit button but a bigger part has been the delay in unzapping the suspension.

[wonkon-wonk]

dot aint back ,dot aint back
AB Ed is a lying _ _at,(best not eh?)
Early in the morning, Just as day is dawning,
He picks on all the posters that he can ban

[max-elle]

Don't think ed is lying.

http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/ChatterBank/Que stion670712.html

So why did dot post at 21.21using dot.hawkes????

[wonkon-wonk]

is that the name she says is banned?