I can give you some guidelines to answer this question, but first of all, you've not really provided all the information that would be needed to answer this question if it was included in an exam for example.
I'll assume that the "fresh" tuna as you refer to it was analysed within a day of capture. However, the "couple of weeks old" sample concerns me. You've not mentioned quite a few things about it. For example, how was it stored? What temperature was it stored at? Was it ever frozen? Were the fish eviscerated? Type of packaging eg modified atmosphere, vacuum packed? Were they whole fish or just meat? I'm not criticising, but all these factors are relevant as I'll try and show.
Fish meat per se is completely sterile. Bacteria are only found on skin, gills and the intestinal tract of fish species. Bacterial contamination of fish nearly always arises from contamination that occurs during gutting, contaminated ship equipment and surfaces, contaminated ice used in storage, contaminated storage containers, transfer of pathogens between animal/human vector and fish and partial decomposition arising from landing delays. Once landed, dockside equipment can also transfer bacteria to fish as well as unhygienic practices and human/fish vector transfer. Now to the bacteria.
(continued)