Jonathan King

[pjb1]

Am I right in thinking that to get parole you have to at least admit your crime. If so, how did he get released and straight away say " Im innocent" to the waiting press? Am I wrong or should the old perv be back inside?

[netibiza]

To his mind 14ys old, is old enough to consent and "enjoy" (sick man) - that perv should beshot!!

[smudge]

I thought he was freed because he had served his half of the original sentence given - although I could be wrong?

All sexual perverts should be made to serve the whole term & more!

[Kay]

Should be castrated and thrown to the public!!!!!

[Zen]

Should still be inside,picking the soap up in the communal shower.

[smudge]

Oh, I bet he'll miss that Zen!

[jno]

http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question102554.html - previous thread

[smudge]

I missed that previous thread jno - interesting though.

As I thought, his release must have been more to do with him serving half his sentence & not through an admission of guilt.

[Madge.B]

send him to the moon!

[pjb1]

Thanks for the previous thread jno, sorry didn't see it. I think basically the law can be an arse! (no pun intended)!!

[eupraxia]

yes Jonathan King is guilty and should have served his time, but don't forget those like that poor man who was murdered for the same crime just because of morons who convinced themselves he was a pervert. he had done nothing wrong. His only "crime" was he was disabled.

This whole thing is getting scary and messy. those who are commiting these offences are getting away with it those that are guilty by association are made to suffer.Including the perverts victims. Believe me they suffer the most.

Mob metality does not work. The work should be to help the victim not constantly giving into media witch hunts.Channel five being the biggest offender having interviewed JK the day he left prison. Why the hell did they give the man any air time.

Eupraxia