Donate SIGN UP

Yasmina and the Apprentice

Avatar Image
bobthebandit | 00:02 Mon 08th Jun 2009 | Film, Media & TV
9 Answers
Apparently Yasmina has complained to the BBC for false editing, and that she was made to look a liar after the interview with Claude
She said the interview "went well" to her colleagues after another interview, and not the bad one with Claude.
This whole series appears heavily cut and falsely edited.
I reckon most of Alan Sugar's jokes and funny retorts are added on later when there is no one in the room, except the BBC cameramen!
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by bobthebandit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The whole thing is staged and a fix, who`d want to work for a jewish Sid James lookalike spiv anyway?

The way Alan Sugar bleats about good business and all the rest of the crap he comes out with why take on an apprentice on �100k a year?

�800 million fortune?...My arse!...who the fook owns anything by Amstrad?
The whole series isn't what it appears to be. Sugar's offices are in Brentwood not London. The only shot you see is when they get into the cab. The boardroom is a studio.

I've been director of a documentary and we have edited and cut things to make for a better viewing experience. Thats entertainment!

As for Yasmina's moaning. Not the best thing to do having been officially announced as Apprentice winner.

We should remember that Sugar can **** it up and make mistakes just like the rest of us.

Neext year I would like to see general people in the street been given a go instead of managers and owners of businesses. Harry the 30 year old milkman winning the Apprentice would be more in line with Sugar's roots.
Well said socket2008
Less of the anti-semitism please Elvis, and if you've got a Sky box it's probably Amstrad.
Anti-semitism? My old Sky box was Amstrad and it was a load of sh!t, like the rest of his products...the last being the Amstrad Fax machine..last seen being sold in BP filling stations at �19.99

The man is a glorified spiv and that`s all...he tried his hand at football and fooked off once the big boys got involved

He`s full of sh!te and only doing this show for the money
Not that interested but I read somewhere that he is not in elctronics any mare and his busisness is property (anyway Amstrad was worth �800m at one point but he sold it for �125m.. What I dislike about the show is that most of the 'applicants' are rubbish (how on earth did James for example ma nage to get a highly paid management job -p or was he lying too).. The show is contrived to make Sugar some money and publicity. I also dislike the way he is portaid as having all these high powered business friends when he probably doesnt know them at all..
Why is it when someone has made money from nothing, the public have to run him/her down. Sugar obviously has a business head on his shoulders, else he wouldn't have made his fortune!

It's the same with Simon Cowell, he worked hard to make his money to start with as well.

Good luck to them both I say
I didnt criticise him for making money. I dislike the whole comcept of the show. Some of the tasks the team have to undertake are embarrassing, more like a game show than an interview.for a �100k job. The one who named the pants cereal realised that and he was spoofing it all the way..
Yasmina's protest was made before she was told she had won, and she played it down once she heard (this didn't go out live, I think they may have been told the day before); and it was against the BBC not against Sugar. Sounds a fair enough complaint to me - remember the creative editing of the documentary of the queen last year?

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Yasmina and the Apprentice

Answer Question >>

Related Questions