ChatterBank1 min ago
Andew Marr show
Did any one else see the Andrew Marr(AM) show this morning?
I was very impressed by the way Peter Mandelson(PM) turned AM over. It really was a man against a boy. Say or think what you like about PM he is one of the most able politicians around today. Perhaps he should be the next Prime Minister?
I was very impressed by the way Peter Mandelson(PM) turned AM over. It really was a man against a boy. Say or think what you like about PM he is one of the most able politicians around today. Perhaps he should be the next Prime Minister?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by scotman. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I saw a partial repeat later and I agree. I admit I'm not his biggest fan but he's undoubtedly one of the most competent politicians of any shade.
In fact it could be fair to say that in this climate of mistrust of MPs, and notwithstanding some of Mandie's own misdemeanours in the past, poor old Andrew Marr did seem a bit like putty in his hands. A political "heavyweight" if ever there was one.
In fact it could be fair to say that in this climate of mistrust of MPs, and notwithstanding some of Mandie's own misdemeanours in the past, poor old Andrew Marr did seem a bit like putty in his hands. A political "heavyweight" if ever there was one.
Naomi
Well he'd have to become leader of the Labour party. This would mean resigning his peerage for a start. I wouldn't bet against him if he set his mind to it. There isn't much quality of (labour)opposition to him.
I am not sure if it is necessary for the Prime Minister to be a sitting MP. If it is he would need to get elected to a constituency. Again I can't see that being beyond him
Well he'd have to become leader of the Labour party. This would mean resigning his peerage for a start. I wouldn't bet against him if he set his mind to it. There isn't much quality of (labour)opposition to him.
I am not sure if it is necessary for the Prime Minister to be a sitting MP. If it is he would need to get elected to a constituency. Again I can't see that being beyond him
True, Gromit, I never thought of that.
Mind you, for the "comeback man" this should present no problem. He renounces his Peerage, gets elected to the Commons again, becomes (naturally) a senior government minister, is caught with his fingers in the till, resigns (for the third time), gets a post in Europe and, after a suitable period of penance, is re-appointed to the Lords so that he can hold another ministerial post. (After all, let's not allow a trifling issue such as being unelected get in the way of a brilliant career) .
Easy Peasy!
Mind you, for the "comeback man" this should present no problem. He renounces his Peerage, gets elected to the Commons again, becomes (naturally) a senior government minister, is caught with his fingers in the till, resigns (for the third time), gets a post in Europe and, after a suitable period of penance, is re-appointed to the Lords so that he can hold another ministerial post. (After all, let's not allow a trifling issue such as being unelected get in the way of a brilliant career) .
Easy Peasy!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.