News1 min ago
Should this Minister be sacked?
9 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-119198 6/No-10-fails-cheap-rent-MP-Shahid-Malik-myste rious-second-office.html
Should Shahid Malik now be sacked, just 48 hours after being returned to Government, or will it be another cover up by Brown?
Should Shahid Malik now be sacked, just 48 hours after being returned to Government, or will it be another cover up by Brown?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.No cover up here is the report you can read it for yourself:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedi a/archive/01421/Edited_version_of__1421412a.do c
53. To conclude my consideration of the position in respect of [property1] and 60 Daisy Hill, I am satisfied that Mr Malik has not breached the requirements of Sections 7.1 and 7.7 of the Code in relation to either of these two properties ...
It is not therefore been shown that Mr Malik has breeched the Ministerial Code in respect of [property2] the house he currently occupies in Dewsbury.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedi a/archive/01421/Edited_version_of__1421412a.do c
53. To conclude my consideration of the position in respect of [property1] and 60 Daisy Hill, I am satisfied that Mr Malik has not breached the requirements of Sections 7.1 and 7.7 of the Code in relation to either of these two properties ...
It is not therefore been shown that Mr Malik has breeched the Ministerial Code in respect of [property2] the house he currently occupies in Dewsbury.
Brown obviously does not learn from his mistakes. Before the ink was dry some cohort cleared Malik of any offence. Its a slap in the eye for those wishing to clean up the system. From what I gather Malik was only cleared of paying by cash which is a Muslim tradition. Now what rule says they get expenses for a 3rd property?
Verging on the criminal has never been a problem for MPs and the people in charge of them.
That petty crook Peter Mandelson had to resign from the cabinet TWICE for dodgy dealings.
And here he is, back in cabinet, as Lord Mandelson.
A slap in the face for the ordinairy members of the public who try to lead an honest life.
Seems as an MP you can do anything but still be forgiven.
Seems George Orwell was right when he wrote Animal Farm.
That petty crook Peter Mandelson had to resign from the cabinet TWICE for dodgy dealings.
And here he is, back in cabinet, as Lord Mandelson.
A slap in the face for the ordinairy members of the public who try to lead an honest life.
Seems as an MP you can do anything but still be forgiven.
Seems George Orwell was right when he wrote Animal Farm.
-- answer removed --
jake - the scope of the enquiry did not encompass this new allegation that for 2005-2008 Malik was claiming rent for a second constituency office within his constituency residence. The Green Book clearly states that MPs are not allowed to claim for 'leasing or mortgage costs' on offices based at their home.
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/HofC psap.pdf
5.12.9. Homes used as offices
You may use as an office for your Parliamentary duties any part of your home, or of any other building which you lease or own. You may claim for any additional costs incurred (eg: extra telephone lines, heat, light) but not leasing or mortgage costs.
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/HofC psap.pdf
5.12.9. Homes used as offices
You may use as an office for your Parliamentary duties any part of your home, or of any other building which you lease or own. You may claim for any additional costs incurred (eg: extra telephone lines, heat, light) but not leasing or mortgage costs.