If There Was Any Doubt Of Labour's Anti...
News4 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Loosehead. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Ignoring the very complex historical reasons - exploitation by other territories etc - the reason that these debts have occured is because of the way in which trade rules restrict these countries abililty to control their own economies. One of the key objectives of Make Poverty History is addressing the political issues that sustain the poverty traps and changing these trade laws.
Just cancelling the debts and/or providing more aid will not cure the problem in any long term way. If we learnt anything from Live Aid, it is that throwing money at the situation is not enough.
Sorry, to specifically address your comment about "a propensity for over spending" I would like to add that the debts we're talking about consist of compound interest on compound interest, meaning that the countries are expending vast proportions of their national income just paying off the interest - and failing.
Aid is often granted dependent on countries liberalising their ecconomies and allowing foriegn companies to set up. This typically has the net result of resulting in a net outflow of capital from the countries, again, further empoverishing the population. These are the kinds of trade agreements MPH wants to see scrapped.