Donate SIGN UP

�1.66 per week c.s.a

Avatar Image
zzxxee | 16:48 Fri 21st Aug 2009 | ChatterBank
12 Answers
that is what my daughters estranged father has been ordered to pay for her up keep thats not even going to cover a swimming session at our local pool what a joke is anyone else getting a lower amount for their child??
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 12 of 12rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by zzxxee. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
That is truly disgusting.
Yes...absolutley nothing.
Question Author
im not a money grabbing mother but i have worked to feed and clothe my daughter since she was born and he is sitting on benifits he has not seen her for 3 years so the least he could do would be to support her financially by setting up say a trust fund id rather he didnt pay nothing as �1.66 is an insult to her
Question Author
i no ummmm this is the first financial contribution hes had to make previous to that he to payed didly squat
At least he has the excuse of not working. My Ex has a very well paid job but would rather spend it on himself.
If he is on benefits, then that is probably a fair percentage of his spare cash?
Question Author
no but he has worked and now the c.s.a has finally caught up with him hes jacked his well paid job in and resorted to benifits a bit of a coincidence methinks
I just can't get my head round it. Why would they want their own child/ren go without. We're not talking about luxuries here either.
Question Author
any money she gets will be hers, but help with uniforms and school equiptment ect would help out its not cheap as most parents know
you chose him to sire your child.....he must have some redeeming features for you?
Question Author
**** off tambo you idiot if you do not want to answer in a sensible nature to my post then please dont bother

1 to 12 of 12rss feed

Do you know the answer?

�1.66 per week c.s.a

Answer Question >>