Quizzes & Puzzles7 mins ago
How to turn off seatbelt alarm on BMW 6 series?
16 Answers
Hi
The seatbelt alarm on my car is driving me nuts - I can\'t drive 50 yds before it starts going off - is there any way to turn it off?
Thanks in advance
Alun
The seatbelt alarm on my car is driving me nuts - I can\'t drive 50 yds before it starts going off - is there any way to turn it off?
Thanks in advance
Alun
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by alun1smile. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.you are taking a big chance here
prepare to be inundated by the self righteous lot who believe it is every persons responsibility to wear their seatbelt
you are unfortunately not free to decide whether to wear a seat belt when driving
the law of course states that you dont have to wear a seatbelt 'when performing a manoeuvre which includes reversing'
a manoeuvre by definition being a planned move or series of moves
you could make the case that say - reversing off your drive and then driving to your destination is such a sequence of events but the stasi will bully the case through the courts - its another earner
at least there are no points put on your licence
prepare to be inundated by the self righteous lot who believe it is every persons responsibility to wear their seatbelt
you are unfortunately not free to decide whether to wear a seat belt when driving
the law of course states that you dont have to wear a seatbelt 'when performing a manoeuvre which includes reversing'
a manoeuvre by definition being a planned move or series of moves
you could make the case that say - reversing off your drive and then driving to your destination is such a sequence of events but the stasi will bully the case through the courts - its another earner
at least there are no points put on your licence
Kinell's right.
They'll be along in a minute - they know who they are - the ones that think doing 71 in a 70 limit warrants nothing short of death as a punishment for this most heinous of crimes.
I can hear them adenoidally whining already "you must wear your seat belt, its the law, you must wear your seat belt, its the law, you must wear your seat belt, its the law...."
They'll be along in a minute - they know who they are - the ones that think doing 71 in a 70 limit warrants nothing short of death as a punishment for this most heinous of crimes.
I can hear them adenoidally whining already "you must wear your seat belt, its the law, you must wear your seat belt, its the law, you must wear your seat belt, its the law...."
Hi Alun, just a bit of advise, DON'T I hope it never happens BUT if you were involved in a smash and the worst happened your insurance would be one of the first to with hold payment, I think I would put up with the alarm than risk your life & leaving your family ( If you have a family) with financial problems
What would his insurance company withhold payment for?
If you are referring to the damage to his own car because he wasn't wearing a seatbelt, they most certainly would not withhold any money - to do so would put them in breach of contract.
If you are referring to compensation for his injuries because somebody else drove into him, there would be a 25% reduction in any damages he would receive from the other driver's insurance company (Froom v Butcher (1975) and Jones v Wilkins (2001).
If you are referring to compensation payable to another driver becuase he was at fault, the Road TRaffic Act does not allow this type of exclusion in motor policies.
If you are referring to the damage to his own car because he wasn't wearing a seatbelt, they most certainly would not withhold any money - to do so would put them in breach of contract.
If you are referring to compensation for his injuries because somebody else drove into him, there would be a 25% reduction in any damages he would receive from the other driver's insurance company (Froom v Butcher (1975) and Jones v Wilkins (2001).
If you are referring to compensation payable to another driver becuase he was at fault, the Road TRaffic Act does not allow this type of exclusion in motor policies.
The death benefit under a motor policy is very limited, mine, for instance, is just £2,000, and nowhere does it say cover will be refused or reduced for not wearing a seatbelt and therefore the insurance would operate. If my insurer refused on the grounds a seatbelt were not worn they would be in breach of contract.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.