Crosswords0 min ago
Afghan land mines
With our soldiers continually blown up with IEDs why is it the local population unnaffected? You would expect to see many Afghan amputees.
Do you believe they are in league with the Taliban?
Do you believe they are in league with the Taliban?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by rov1200. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Another consideration, however, is that most of the IED's are triggered by the enemy, obviously to elicit the most damage possible. In the truest sense of the word, they aren't land mines that require someone stepping on them.
The triggering is often done by using cellular phones or other transmitters. Little would be gained by setting off a high power IED targeting the civilian population...
The triggering is often done by using cellular phones or other transmitters. Little would be gained by setting off a high power IED targeting the civilian population...
Many civilians are killed by IEDs in Afghanistan, but we are not really interested, and when we are told we quickly forget.
http://www.thaindian....oundup_100253938.html
rov,
If you had bothered to google it, you would have found reports of civilian deaths. So, turning your wrong assessment of casualties on its head, do you think that the fact that the Taleban blow up Afghan civilians as well proves that they are not in league with the Taleban?
http://www.thaindian....oundup_100253938.html
rov,
If you had bothered to google it, you would have found reports of civilian deaths. So, turning your wrong assessment of casualties on its head, do you think that the fact that the Taleban blow up Afghan civilians as well proves that they are not in league with the Taleban?
Gromit I did google it but a lot of it was past history before we stepped up the conflict and before our soldiers were being injured by them. There are a lot of IED's laying around from past conflict with the Russians and many of those have not been cleared. I am talking about this new episode where many have been laid by the Taliban.
I believe there must be some form of communication between the Taliban and the tribes to prevent civilians entering the area.
We all witnessed what happened recently when the Taliban ambushed those 2 oil tankers and taken to tribal areas for use by the civilians.
My point is hearts and minds is pointless if we are talking to the other side not supporters of NATO.
I believe there must be some form of communication between the Taliban and the tribes to prevent civilians entering the area.
We all witnessed what happened recently when the Taliban ambushed those 2 oil tankers and taken to tribal areas for use by the civilians.
My point is hearts and minds is pointless if we are talking to the other side not supporters of NATO.
Clanad although you may be correct about the remote triggering of IEDs but it seems the Taliban still use the pressure plate ones that are activated by treading on them or vehicles going over them. Read this report handed to soldiers in the field:
http://afghanlessons....7/know-your-ieds.html
http://afghanlessons....7/know-your-ieds.html
I think this small section from a report answers my question. They are in league!
It is common to fine VI IEDs on routes that are not as heavily traveled by Afghans, and are usually on routes where the enemy can influence the locals to stay off of the route. The local areas can be informed of the threat so they don’t travel on the route. This raises the chance that only coalition forces will be the ones to initiate the IED.
It is common to fine VI IEDs on routes that are not as heavily traveled by Afghans, and are usually on routes where the enemy can influence the locals to stay off of the route. The local areas can be informed of the threat so they don’t travel on the route. This raises the chance that only coalition forces will be the ones to initiate the IED.
rov1200
I don't believed you read the link so here are some examples:
September 30, 2009
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan (Reuters) - A roadside bomb killed 30 people in southern Afghanistan on Tuesday, officials said. More than 1,500 civilians have been killed by violence in Afghanistan so far this year, the United Nations said last week.
23rd September 2009
Kabul, Sep 23 (DPA) Twelve Afghan civilians including women and children were killed in two separate roadside bomb explosions in the south and southwestern regions, officials said Wednesday.
12th October 2009
Five civilians were killed Sunday in a roadside bomb explosion in Afghanistan’s southern province of Zabul, an official said.
7th August 2009
Separate roadside bombings in volatile Helmand province today killed at least 26 people, including 21 members of a wedding party and five police officers, Afghan officials said.
25th March 2009
One roadside bomb killed 10 civilians Wednesday in a van along a route used by foreign troops in eastern Afghanistan
May 2008
A roadside bomb blast in south-western Afghanistan killed eight civilians,
Road side bombs + Afghanistan + civilians
i suggest you improve your googling skills.
By my rekoning, the scale of Afghan civilian deaths is far greater than the deaths to our troops. so, toi repeat my question to you,
Do you still think these civilians are colluding?
I don't believed you read the link so here are some examples:
September 30, 2009
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan (Reuters) - A roadside bomb killed 30 people in southern Afghanistan on Tuesday, officials said. More than 1,500 civilians have been killed by violence in Afghanistan so far this year, the United Nations said last week.
23rd September 2009
Kabul, Sep 23 (DPA) Twelve Afghan civilians including women and children were killed in two separate roadside bomb explosions in the south and southwestern regions, officials said Wednesday.
12th October 2009
Five civilians were killed Sunday in a roadside bomb explosion in Afghanistan’s southern province of Zabul, an official said.
7th August 2009
Separate roadside bombings in volatile Helmand province today killed at least 26 people, including 21 members of a wedding party and five police officers, Afghan officials said.
25th March 2009
One roadside bomb killed 10 civilians Wednesday in a van along a route used by foreign troops in eastern Afghanistan
May 2008
A roadside bomb blast in south-western Afghanistan killed eight civilians,
Road side bombs + Afghanistan + civilians
i suggest you improve your googling skills.
By my rekoning, the scale of Afghan civilian deaths is far greater than the deaths to our troops. so, toi repeat my question to you,
Do you still think these civilians are colluding?
You will find if you can be bothered, links to all those civilan roadside bomb deaths here:
http://www.google.co....Search&meta=&aq=f&oq=
http://www.google.co....Search&meta=&aq=f&oq=
Gromit
We can swap links if you wish but maybe you mis read my question.
""Do you believe they are in league with the Taliban?""
Now read the answer to my link above:
""It is common to fine VI IEDs on routes that are not as heavily traveled by Afghans, and are usually on routes where the enemy can influence the locals to stay off of the route. The local areas can be informed of the threat so they don’t travel on the route. This raises the chance that only coalition forces will be the ones to initiate the IED. ""
Bombs have existed in Afghanistan for many years and civilians have been injured. Maybe you believe the tribes are on our side and wish to see the back of the Taliban.
We can swap links if you wish but maybe you mis read my question.
""Do you believe they are in league with the Taliban?""
Now read the answer to my link above:
""It is common to fine VI IEDs on routes that are not as heavily traveled by Afghans, and are usually on routes where the enemy can influence the locals to stay off of the route. The local areas can be informed of the threat so they don’t travel on the route. This raises the chance that only coalition forces will be the ones to initiate the IED. ""
Bombs have existed in Afghanistan for many years and civilians have been injured. Maybe you believe the tribes are on our side and wish to see the back of the Taliban.
Gromit just in case you forgot to put your glasses on I repeat:
It is common to fine VI IEDs on routes that are not as heavily traveled by Afghans, and are usually on routes where the enemy can influence the locals to stay off of the route. The local areas can be informed of the threat so they don’t travel on the route.
It is common to fine VI IEDs on routes that are not as heavily traveled by Afghans, and are usually on routes where the enemy can influence the locals to stay off of the route. The local areas can be informed of the threat so they don’t travel on the route.
Gromit
I'd better point out my link again
http://afghanlessons....7/know-your-ieds.html
This was written as a blog by the men that know, the soldiers in the field operating every day against the telaban, they should know.
I'd better point out my link again
http://afghanlessons....7/know-your-ieds.html
This was written as a blog by the men that know, the soldiers in the field operating every day against the telaban, they should know.