ChatterBank3 mins ago
Correct Driving technique
His thoery is that you put your indicator on and then sit and wait for a gap in the lane you are moving in to as this lets the drivers know you want to pull over so they let you in.
I appreciate this makes a lot of sense and is the most common practice, however I remember being taught to wait for the gap in the traffic and then indicate when you you know you are going to move. My theories for this are that it is mirror, signal, manouver not signal, mirror, manouver. Also if I see a car put its indicator on when there is no room to pull in fron of me I panic they have not seen me and are going to pull in to me.
Shouldn't an indicator mean you are moving, not intending to soon.
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by lilyfrog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Generally it is as you say , Mirror, signal, manouver. Often though on busy motorways you could wait all day for a gap so signalling your intentions is often used to encourage some kind sole to leave a gap to let you into.
This is most common when,you are on the inside lane and come up to truck and have to get past. The highway code encourages you to move over to the left but in doing so you put yourself up the backside of a truck all the time and have to repeat the above all the way down the MW. That I think is why a lot of people stay in the middle lane, but that's another story.
On the police advanced course and the heavy goods course, the procedure taught is to start the signal when an overtaking vehicle is beside you. That vehicle will not react, but the next one will have maximum warning that you intend to move out.
No, an indicator is not to show what you are doing now. People can see that without a signal. The idea is to warn them of what you intend to do, so they can make allowances in good time. Of course many people do signal and steer at the same time, and then the point of signalling at all is lost.
I take Loosehead's point, but suggest that if this is necessary, then the traffic is too close together for the speed and I for one prefer not to get between them.
I was taught that you put your indicator on just before you move, if it is safe to move (ie not when there is another car beside you). I agree with you about the panic thing, i do it too!)
I also hate cars that move lanes and then dont cancel their signal and drive for miles with an indicator on. How can they not see/hear the indicator flashing!
When I was doing my motorbike training (the instructor was an ex police bike instructor) I was advised that all an indicator tells other drivers is that the bulb is working. It is your observation and general road skills that alert you to what other drivers intend to do. That's why learners aren't allowed on motorways, they haven't enough experience to anticipate what other drivers might do.
Depressed has a good point... the standard of driving on motorways is pretty terrible. Particularly people with fast cars who think they can do what they like, without mentioning those people with trailers or caravans who don't follow the rules in the highway code, and the middle lane hoggers.
If we all followed the highway code then driving on motorways would be a much nicer experience.
Of course that assumes that everyone knows the highway code... which we all know isn't true!
Oh for annual tests to make sure we all kept our skills up to scratch. I suspect this would possibly make more Government revenue than speed cameras!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.