ChatterBank1 min ago
Foreign criminals
33 Answers
http://www.timesonlin...cs/article6965743.ece
Once again Brown thinks more of foreigners than his own people.
£5,000 that is available to offenders who go voluntarily when they have finished their sentence, whilst our own offenders are only given £46 discharge grant, plus a travel warrant to their home town, and they cannot start to receive benefits for a fortnight.
Wouldn't it be better for foreign criminals, when found guilty to be deported immediately, instead of the taxpayer paying the cost of a spell in jail for them, plus this return home package, at the time of their release?
Once again Brown thinks more of foreigners than his own people.
£5,000 that is available to offenders who go voluntarily when they have finished their sentence, whilst our own offenders are only given £46 discharge grant, plus a travel warrant to their home town, and they cannot start to receive benefits for a fortnight.
Wouldn't it be better for foreign criminals, when found guilty to be deported immediately, instead of the taxpayer paying the cost of a spell in jail for them, plus this return home package, at the time of their release?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
So the government are in league with the Open Borders group...to what end?
Do you think the Labour government actively encourages illegal immigration? If so, why are there border agencies? Are they just there for window dressing? If so, what possible reason could the government have for encouraging illegal immigration?
Is it an anti-inflationary measure (cheap labour?)
Do you think the Labour government actively encourages illegal immigration? If so, why are there border agencies? Are they just there for window dressing? If so, what possible reason could the government have for encouraging illegal immigration?
Is it an anti-inflationary measure (cheap labour?)
-- answer removed --
"Is it an anti-inflationary measure (cheap labour?) "
That's only part of the story, sp. The Labour party is in collusion with big business, ethnic minorities and gays (bah! You pretend you don't know!) to hoodwink naive treehugging liberals in order to systematically destroy Britain behind the back of its slumbering population and divide the plunder. 'Racism' and anti-discrimination laws are nought but a dastardly ruse to stifle all opposition and eliminate those who stumble across the plot: just like the courageous journal which dares to fight the uphill battle in defence of Great Britain - the Daily Mail.
How am I doing, AOG?
That's only part of the story, sp. The Labour party is in collusion with big business, ethnic minorities and gays (bah! You pretend you don't know!) to hoodwink naive treehugging liberals in order to systematically destroy Britain behind the back of its slumbering population and divide the plunder. 'Racism' and anti-discrimination laws are nought but a dastardly ruse to stifle all opposition and eliminate those who stumble across the plot: just like the courageous journal which dares to fight the uphill battle in defence of Great Britain - the Daily Mail.
How am I doing, AOG?
Kromovaracun
Thank you for clueing me up...
Damn Gordon Brown and his cronies. Damn them all to hell.
I shall be voting BNP at the next General Election. They're the only party that speaks the truth...the only thing that bothers me is that like our current PM, Nicky Griffin only has one eye.
We can't have two cyclops in a row leading the nation, surely?
Thank you for clueing me up...
Damn Gordon Brown and his cronies. Damn them all to hell.
I shall be voting BNP at the next General Election. They're the only party that speaks the truth...the only thing that bothers me is that like our current PM, Nicky Griffin only has one eye.
We can't have two cyclops in a row leading the nation, surely?
-- answer removed --
Ahms..
UKBA do patrol the borders (as you put it) - it is they who deal with the passports as one departs arrives. They also manage the visa process. The primary problem is with overstayers (who one might argue shouldn't have been granted a visa in the first place), asylum seekers and illegals. Every country worth migrating to has a problem with illegals. To reitterate, these people know their rights (or just get free legal advice from people who are employed at taxpayers expenses to tell them how to maximise their rights) and getting rid of them is bloody difficult.
AOG is right when he says change the process - but there are many who would say the Home Secretary or the PM don't control the process. It is a legal process and the last time I looked the judiciary where kept very separate from the Government. Otherwise how does one explain why, when all EU countries have the same Human Rights legislation, we in the UK seem to make such a meal of keeping these bar-stewards out in the first place (vis-a-vis Calais camp - sitting waiting to hop onto a lorry) or getting rid of them once they are here. The Attorney General needs reminding more frequently who is going to be paying his fat pension, and poke the judiciary a bit harder to remind them who is going to be paying their fat pensions.
UKBA do patrol the borders (as you put it) - it is they who deal with the passports as one departs arrives. They also manage the visa process. The primary problem is with overstayers (who one might argue shouldn't have been granted a visa in the first place), asylum seekers and illegals. Every country worth migrating to has a problem with illegals. To reitterate, these people know their rights (or just get free legal advice from people who are employed at taxpayers expenses to tell them how to maximise their rights) and getting rid of them is bloody difficult.
AOG is right when he says change the process - but there are many who would say the Home Secretary or the PM don't control the process. It is a legal process and the last time I looked the judiciary where kept very separate from the Government. Otherwise how does one explain why, when all EU countries have the same Human Rights legislation, we in the UK seem to make such a meal of keeping these bar-stewards out in the first place (vis-a-vis Calais camp - sitting waiting to hop onto a lorry) or getting rid of them once they are here. The Attorney General needs reminding more frequently who is going to be paying his fat pension, and poke the judiciary a bit harder to remind them who is going to be paying their fat pensions.
Seems strange that Jack Straw who champions human rights is the same minister who had first hand experience and confidante of Blair in preparation of the war in Iraq. So its alright to bomb another country to smithereens unlawfully but not protect his own country from illegal immigrants using a much hated human rights law.
