Is there any logic

[lilsecret]

in the method the AB Editor adopts regarding posts/threads?

A user asked earlier if there were any internet sites which streamed football games - ie Wednesday's Man United v Man City League Cup encounter.

I recall that four sites were given and now the post has been removed (I think).

I can understand the Ed's action if watching football on streamed sites was illegal, but cannot understand why he is so uptight about them being mentioned.

So this is the new AB which we were so much looking forward to.

Out of season I know, but Bah Humbug!

[steg]

now that's a sirprize

[AB Editor]

We do not support illegal streaming of sport, films or other media. It is editorial policy to remove illegal links from our site.

The logic is quite straightforward. Have you read the rules at all?

http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/Info/Rules/


All the best

Spare Ed

[lilsecret]

Editor. I respect your policy to remove illegal streaming of sport etc from AnswerBank.

I have read the Site Rules and indeed attempt to adhere to them. ie: Do not post any material that is defamatory, obscene, unlawful . . .

Nevertheless, the logic is still clouded because the links to sites which were quoted are not illegal.

However, it's always your decision; AnswerBank is your forum - for what it's worth.

[lilsecret]

steg . . . .

I could be you, I could be me;
I could be someone else; one day we may see.

[steg]

you couldn't be me, you don't have any class,..................... but you are a few others