ChatterBank13 mins ago
Criminal cop supported by the National Black Police Association, of which he is a former president.
21 Answers
http://www.telegraph....d-for-corruption.html
How did this Police Officer rise to such a rank, with his past record?
http://www.telegraph....-Dizaei-timeline.html
http://www.telegraph....i-Dizaei-profile.html
Couldn't be anything to do with the colour of his skin could it?
I am not the only one to think this it has also been suggested on the media.
How did this Police Officer rise to such a rank, with his past record?
http://www.telegraph....-Dizaei-timeline.html
http://www.telegraph....i-Dizaei-profile.html
Couldn't be anything to do with the colour of his skin could it?
I am not the only one to think this it has also been suggested on the media.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.[Part Two]
The guidance subsequently produced by the Association of Chief Police Officers repeatedly warns that facts are not relevant. It says that police victimisation takes place “whether or not the police are shown to be indifferent {to the plight of the victim]”. In short, if the victim feels he has been badly treated – or indeed anyone else does - and he says so, then he has and no investigation into the facts is necessary.
This is the atmosphere in which Dizaei prospered. So petrified were his bosses of accusations of racism that virtually anything he did was swept under the carpet. Among those (apparently unfounded) accusations against him:
Lying to police about where his car was when it was damaged (for which he was tried and acquitted of perverting the course of justice).
Falsifying mileage claims.
Advising a defence team on how to undermine a criminal prosecution.
Misusing his corporate credit card.
No other business would tolerate such behaviour by one of its employees. The toleration by senior managers in the Met was a direct result of their paralysis which was born out of their reaction to Macpherson.
The guidance subsequently produced by the Association of Chief Police Officers repeatedly warns that facts are not relevant. It says that police victimisation takes place “whether or not the police are shown to be indifferent {to the plight of the victim]”. In short, if the victim feels he has been badly treated – or indeed anyone else does - and he says so, then he has and no investigation into the facts is necessary.
This is the atmosphere in which Dizaei prospered. So petrified were his bosses of accusations of racism that virtually anything he did was swept under the carpet. Among those (apparently unfounded) accusations against him:
Lying to police about where his car was when it was damaged (for which he was tried and acquitted of perverting the course of justice).
Falsifying mileage claims.
Advising a defence team on how to undermine a criminal prosecution.
Misusing his corporate credit card.
No other business would tolerate such behaviour by one of its employees. The toleration by senior managers in the Met was a direct result of their paralysis which was born out of their reaction to Macpherson.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.