Question Author
daftgrandad
You asked me to itemise the remarks,which have offended you, well for starters your first post read:
/// AOG.You and I are probably around the same age?
I do not think you can compare queing for hand-outs as you so nicely put it,with
people who are prepared to WAIT! to be served
Curmudgeon,I think,is your middle name.///
Your whole post had a sarcastic edge to it, you shouted "wait" for some reason, and then you unnecessary added the " curmudgeon" remark, why?
/// You are getting more cynical as the afternoon progresses.///
/// You must live your life on a very short fuse ///
/// to your blinkered vision ///
I think most would find some of these offensive, especially when the brunt of my post were not my words.
Why you had to introduce"queuing for handouts" V "waiting to be served"? Although it is totally irreverent "queuing for whatever", is the same as "waiting to be served".
You may have been swayed by the postings of some others who regularly take my questions out of context to get over their point.
My question was regarding the silly remarks made by the Immigration Minister Phil Woolas, regarding teaching immigrants to queue the British way.
My remark about hand-outs, was a play on words, due to recent reports that the indigenous population are coming second in line to the immigrants.
I hope this clears things up, you can disagree with my points, but you do not have to reply aggressively.