puzzfuzz, oh yes I would because it's a matter of principle, which is something few of you people seem to understand. Although her intentions are indeed commendable, quite simply she can't afford to do what she wants to do, and like all of us, if she can't afford it, then she can't do it - regardless of the organisation involved. Yes, people believe, but their belief doesn't give them the right to expect the rest of society to help support them whilst they do what they want to do. If she was working and needed extra financial support, I'd have no objection, but I think it's absolutely wrong for anyone who chooses not to work to ask for assistance. The only way I can see for her to get around this without becoming yet another burden on society - however small - is for her to live at home and work for a church locally.
You've brought my non-belief into this and that leads me to another thought. It seems that because a church is involved here people have abandoned their principles. I strongly suspect the reaction would be very different if someone asked for financial assistance to enable them to choose to work voluntarily for a non-religious organisation - and so it should be.
Oh, and by the way, having been a Christian in the past, I'm at a loss to understand what you think I am 'obviously' missing in my life, but it certainly isn't the penchant for discarding my principles when it suits me. Furthermore, if you think I believe there is nothing after death, you clearly haven't read my posts closely enough.