Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Guilty or not Guilty?
16 Answers
Male1 at a party hears that his friend, Male 2 is having some "beef" with some of the other partygoers and a row kicks off at the end of the road.
Male 1 goes to the kitchen and picks up two 8" kitchen knives and heads off to the row, he hands one of the knives to Male 2 who ends up stabbing someone in the groin area whilst Male 1 stabs another person in the stomach so severley that the victims bowel is visible.
Neither Male 1 or 2 deny handling the knives and claim both stabbings were accidental.
Bearing in mind there were 3 witnesses who saw the stabbings take place and another 7 people who saw Male 1 walking down the road with 2 knives, would you say they intended to cause serious bodily harm or would you side with the accidental claim?
Male 1 goes to the kitchen and picks up two 8" kitchen knives and heads off to the row, he hands one of the knives to Male 2 who ends up stabbing someone in the groin area whilst Male 1 stabs another person in the stomach so severley that the victims bowel is visible.
Neither Male 1 or 2 deny handling the knives and claim both stabbings were accidental.
Bearing in mind there were 3 witnesses who saw the stabbings take place and another 7 people who saw Male 1 walking down the road with 2 knives, would you say they intended to cause serious bodily harm or would you side with the accidental claim?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ELVIS68. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
blades over 4" offensive weapon if you are not cooking with
Carrying the knife even as a threat surely implies you might use it... Def intent with the guy who fetched them not sure about the idiot he handed on to, if he was all fired up there might not be an intent component.
I think man one deserves a bigger sentence but they will both probably get a few weeks cleaning graffiti the way things are at present
Carrying the knife even as a threat surely implies you might use it... Def intent with the guy who fetched them not sure about the idiot he handed on to, if he was all fired up there might not be an intent component.
I think man one deserves a bigger sentence but they will both probably get a few weeks cleaning graffiti the way things are at present
-- answer removed --
Has this case been decided, or are you asking us to make your mind up for you ?
IMO the intent is proven by 'distance'. They had every step of their journey from the kitchen to the site of the confrontation to change their mind/abandon the knives; they didn't because they *intended* to cause harm when they arrived.
IMO the intent is proven by 'distance'. They had every step of their journey from the kitchen to the site of the confrontation to change their mind/abandon the knives; they didn't because they *intended* to cause harm when they arrived.
Thanks for the replies apart from tonyted and his usual lack of input
jack, the case has finished, I was just curious as to what others felt as 3 of the jury couldn`t agree with the rest of us and say they intended to do serious harm.
They agree that both defendants used the knives but not to cause seroius harm
The mind boggles!
jack, the case has finished, I was just curious as to what others felt as 3 of the jury couldn`t agree with the rest of us and say they intended to do serious harm.
They agree that both defendants used the knives but not to cause seroius harm
The mind boggles!