Common Law

[04holmes]

when and why was common law formed?

[squarebear]

Are you referring to common law wifes/husbands?

No such thing.

[Buenchico]

See here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/.../henryii_law_01.shtml

Chris

[saxy_jag]

Common law wasn't 'formed' as one single event or for any single reason. It's what has evolved over the centuries to become the law as it is today, as it applies to everyone in the country.

[237SJ]

It was donkeys years ago. It`s one of the five sources of modern law if my memory serves me correctly

[ann_h]

My understanding is:
Common law is the part of law that is not Statute law (more modern specifically written laws and Acts)
It is based on the old English legal systems, more or less a law by agreement, and is still the basis of most civil law eg contracts, suits for damages etc.
It continues to be added to and modified today by Case law, where a judgement in a particular Case (including clarifying issues in Statute cases) is recorded and becomes part of the body of Common Law for future reference.
The intention is to make the application of the law more consistent overall (ie common law in the sense of it applying equally to each person and each instance, rather than law of the common people)

[fredpuli47]

By 'the common law' we mean all that law we have which is the creation of judges and not created by statute, by an Act of Parliament. We don't apply the term to judgments which interpret ,or apply statutes to given circumstances that arise in some case, .That's known as 'case law'. and the cases which give rise to the judgments are known as 'precedents'.

When was it formed? There's no one date, of course, but the principles were set down in textbooks from the mid C17. They simply explained what had been long established They did not create anything new. One C17 textbook, in particular, is still cited in the courts: Coke's [pronounced 'cook's ] Institutes.See Buenchico's link for more of the history of the common law

There's a lot of common law about! You will find some crimes have never been set down in any statute. Murder is a good example. The definition of murder has not changed for centuries except that a statute has renoved one element from it. The victim had to die 'within a year and a day' of the act causing the death before but that condition has been removed. It made sense many years ago to think that it was unjust to say that a death after that lapse of time was 'caused' by the accused but that was before doctors could keep the victim alive for a long time.Another 'common law' creation is that it's not necessary to intend to kill for murder. An intent to inflict grievous bodily harm is all that's required under English law.

[ann_h]

Thanks Fred - that was my original thought, but having looked online to clarify, Wikipedia appears to be wrong again as it implies case law is part of common law.
Go fix !!!!

[saxy_jag]

Thanks from me too Fred. I think that's pretty much what I wanted to say but wasn't expert enough to go into the detail you have.