Is the above temperature scale based on anything? For example celsius has a 0 of water freezing and 100 for water boiling and kelvins has it's 0 at the point where even atoms stop moving or something like that.
On the original Fahrenheit scale, body temperature was indeed 100 - but the fahrenheit scale was subsequently revised to offer a more standardised difference between the freezing and boiling point of water, and on the revised scale body temp in fahrenheit is the well known 98.6
Mildly interesting, but not especially useful, is the fact that Celcius original scale, he placed boiling point at 0 and freezing point at 100, which was later reversed.
Agree Wildwood; I wish my BBC local radio weather forecasters would just drop F completely. They insist on giving both - must think we're all morons. It must be thirty years since C has been in common use.
chakkaa: That's true, but lots of different scales are named after the people who thought of them - and that goes for scientific laws and hypotheses, too.
Celsius is used because it is named after the person who developed the scale, in the same way as Fahrenheit, Newton, Ampere, Volt and Joule have had physical units named after them.
It is right to refer to a temperature as being so many degrees Celsius, degrees Fahrenheit; but it is incorrect to refer to a temperature as being so many degrees Kelvin, it is simply so many Kelvin.
gingejbee and Lboro, I am well aware, having had a fine scientific education and being once an electronic engineer, that many units are named after such scientists. But that is usually when the full definition of the unit would be long-winded and cumbersome.
But 'centigrade' is a short, completely defining, word which needs no back-up or substitution.
I was never quite happy with 'Hertz' for 'cycles per second' which was usually abbreviated to 'cycles'. A '50-cycle mains supply' is explanatory whereas 'a 50-hertz mains supply' is meaningless until you look up 'hertz'.