If you care to read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Portillo
the article says he graduated from Cambridge with a first class degree in history, so in making the Railway Journeys programmes he was doing the subject which he was educated to do. That doesn't make you a good presenter automatically, but I dare say that the stint in the House of Commons is an education in all kinds of subjects (!), and putting over your point in an agreeable way is one of them. I haven't seen all of the programmes but I have enjoyed those I have watched.
As to children dying young, I think most families suffered in this way. It was 'normal'. I was shocked when I read my first 1911 Census Return as to how many children in that one family had died young. I then looked at that one surname (Cox) in one area of Bristol (Bedminster) and counted up the number of deaths over a 20 year period. About one third were infant deaths. Statistically, hardly representative, but it makes you think. The questions in the 1911 Census about number of years married, and number of children produced, those alive and who had died, stemmed from a growing concern by those in authority that 'something should be done' about it. But first you have to get some 'ammunition'; and this Census was the gathering of data. We have Florence Nightingale to thank for the start of medical statistics!
Names were often recycled. I have found families where the same name was used for three or four children.
And early deaths haven't stopped. You need only look at websites such as those belonging to SANDS (Stillborn & Neonatal Deaths Society) and other charities such as Cuddles, Loving Hands, to be shocked at the sheer number of miscarriages and premature births/deaths. I crochet burial layettes for some of these charities, anything to make the