ChatterBank1 min ago
Justice has been done
10 Answers
Was David Cameron right when he said yesterday "end this human rights insanity", as judges rule paedophiles and rapists should have chance to get off sex offenders' register?
Well in the following case it seems that these particular judges are also fed-up with the human rights insanity, when they dismissed these five traitors appeal against their conviction for hurling hate-filled abuse at our soldiers.
http://tinyurl.com/6bnp9ug
Well in the following case it seems that these particular judges are also fed-up with the human rights insanity, when they dismissed these five traitors appeal against their conviction for hurling hate-filled abuse at our soldiers.
http://tinyurl.com/6bnp9ug
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
<<the loud mouthed chattering classes that push it with their right-on ideas>>
aren't these silly generalisations and corny cliches becoming rather boring and pointless even to the poster?
clearly they aren't intended to promote mature dialogue. More akin to opening a door, shouting abuse then slamming it shut again.
all rather sad and tedious really.
.
aren't these silly generalisations and corny cliches becoming rather boring and pointless even to the poster?
clearly they aren't intended to promote mature dialogue. More akin to opening a door, shouting abuse then slamming it shut again.
all rather sad and tedious really.
.
Got you again Zeuhl by the looks of it, although I dont think it is a generalization.
Perhaps you would like to answer the question with your views then. In the rush to slate me you seem to have forgotten !
Why dont you try arguing against my ascertions instead of adoptinig the pious tw*t mode that only serves to prove my 'generalizations'
Perhaps you would like to answer the question with your views then. In the rush to slate me you seem to have forgotten !
Why dont you try arguing against my ascertions instead of adoptinig the pious tw*t mode that only serves to prove my 'generalizations'
The judges apply the law as it is written or interpreted. As long as governments continue to enact laws which are not properly considered in order to assuage "public opinion" there will be all manner of loopholes in those laws which will be found by clever lawyers.
The correct solution is for governments to draft legislation properly and let it be considered properly by parliament before it is passed and enacted, not to come up with quick fixes just to satisfy the media and public.
The sex offenders register was set up a year before the Human Rights Act came into force, and was amended 5 years after it came into force. You'd think that with 5 years experience of the workings of the Human Rights Act, the government could have come up with an amendment which took into account all aspects of the Human Rights Act, but obviously they didn't.
Still, the judgements do give governments an excuse to have a go at the judiciary instead of addressing the problems inherent in the laws which are being applied.
The correct solution is for governments to draft legislation properly and let it be considered properly by parliament before it is passed and enacted, not to come up with quick fixes just to satisfy the media and public.
The sex offenders register was set up a year before the Human Rights Act came into force, and was amended 5 years after it came into force. You'd think that with 5 years experience of the workings of the Human Rights Act, the government could have come up with an amendment which took into account all aspects of the Human Rights Act, but obviously they didn't.
Still, the judgements do give governments an excuse to have a go at the judiciary instead of addressing the problems inherent in the laws which are being applied.