Mozart's Allegretto In Piano Concerto 17
Twitching & Birdwatching3 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Quizmonster. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hi QM - the reciprocal of powers are roots, therefore an equivalent to 5^0.68 would be the 100th root of 5^68 or even the 50th root of 5^34 i.e. 2.987442829 which is not childishly simple to calculate, although not impossible with the use of logarithms (& antilogs). Better off just poking the figures into a calculator or suchlike.
Greetings QM! You are lucky I'm here, because I don't normally visit the "How it Works" section (you should have tried the "Science" section (There are too many sections, Mr Editor)). I might as well give an answer, even if it duplicates what other people have said.
Reciprocals? Roots? Logarithms? Antilogs? Converging series? I have literally no idea what you are talking about. I'm not so much a mathophobe as a mathematical cretin.
Reciprocal = "one over something"
reciprocal of 2 = 1/2 = 0.5 = a half
reciprocal of 3 = 1/3 = 0.333333 = a third
reciprocal of 10 = 1/10 = 0.1 = a tenth
similarly
reciprocal of 0.5 = 2
reciprocal of 0.25 = 4
reciprocal of 0.2 = 5
reciprocal of 0.001 = 1000
Root = a smaller number that you need to multiply by itself to get to a bigger number, e.g.
3 x 3 = 9 therefore 3 is the "square root" of 9
4 x 4 = 16 therefore 4 is the "square root" of 16
100 x 100 = 10,000 so 100 is the "square root" of 10,000
2 x 2 x 2 = 8, so 2 is the "cube root" of 8
5 x 5 x 5 = 125, so 5 is the "cube root" of 125
2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 16, so 2 is the 4th root of 16
10 is the fifth root of 100,000
20 is the tenth root of 10,240,000,000,000
But a root can also be larger than the thing which it multiplies to get to, if the number is smaller than one you start with:
0.5 x 0.5 = 0.25 (1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4)
therefore 0.5 (1/2) is the square root of 0.25 (1/4)
0.2 x 0.2 x 0.2 = 0.008 (1/5 x 1/5 x 1/5 = 1/125)
therefore 0.2 (1/5) is the cube root of 0.008 (1/125)
0.1 x 0.1 x 0.1 x 0.1 = 0.0001 (1/10 x 1/10 x 1/10 x 1/10 = 1/10,000)
therefore 0.1 (1/10) is the fourth root of 0.0001
A logarithm is a smaller number that makes it easier to multiply large numbers, especially before calculators existed. e.g.
100 = 10 x 10, so the "logarithm of 100" is 2.
1000 = 10 x 10 x 10, so the "logarithm of 1000" is 3.
but
100 x 1000 = 100,000
and
2 + 3 = 5
If you do not have a calculator to do it, you can work it out with logarithms instead. So
100 x 1000 = ?????
log of 100 = 2
log of 1000 = 3
2 + 3 = 5
anti-log of 5 = 100,000
So to work out 100 x 1000, you look up the logs in your log table (2 and 3), add them up (5) and then look up 5 in your anti-log table. It will tell you that 5 is the log of 100,000. This thing about logs and anti-logs is based on the idea that it is easier for children to add small numbers than multiply large numbers.
But the ones I have mentioned are all logarithms to the base of 10. You can have logrithms to any base. So
logarithm (to the base 2) of 4 = 2
logarithm (to the base 2) of 8 = 3
logarithm (to the base 2) of 16 = 4
Converging series? I could explain, but it would bore you to death and is not very relevant to the question you asked.
a to the power of b
is written as
a^b
in printed stuff (not on the internet) it is written as an a with a little b up in the air. So
4^2 = 4 squared = 4 x 4
2^3 = 2 cubed = 2 x 2 x 2
5^6 = "5 to the power of 6" = 5 x 5 x 5 x 5 x 5 x 5
but (usefully)
a to the power of b
multiplied by
a to the power of c
equals
a to the power of (b+c)
e.g. 5^7 x 5^15 = 5^22
(this is also what logarithms are about)
Remember what I said about roots of small numbers? The root of a number which is smaller than one is larger than the number. Similarly, a power which is smaller than one also produces a smaller number. So:
10^2 x 10^3 = 10^5 (100 x 1000 = 100,000)
10^1 x 10^1 = 10^2 (10 x 10 = 100)
but also
10^0.5 x 10^0.5 = 10^1
("ten to the power of a half"
times "ten to the power of a half"
equals "ten to the power of one")
or
10^0.3333 x 10^0.3333 x 10^0.3333 = 10^1
("ten to the power of a third"
times "ten to the powert of a third"
times "ten to the power of a third"
equals "ten to the power of one")
From the last two equations, you will / should be able to realise / notice that
10^0.5 (ten to the power of a half)
is
the square root of 10
and
10^0.3333 (ten to the power of a third)
is
the cube root of 10
so
10 ^ 0.1 (ten to the power of a tenth)
is
the tenth root of 10
and also
10 ^ 0.01 (ten to the power of one-hundredth)
is
the 100th root of 10
In other words,
the square root of something is the number that you have to multiply by itself twice in order to get the number you are looking for, and
the cube root of something is the number that you have to multiply by itself three times in order to get the number you are looking for, and
the tenth root (bla bla bla) ten times, and
the hundredth root (bla bla bla) hundred times, and
the nth rooth (bla bla bla) n times.
But remember that
a to the power of b
multiplied by
a to the power of c
equals
a to the power of (b+c)
?
Good lord, B! I'm definitely going to have to print out all the answers above, so that I can read them at leisure. There's just too much there to grasp directly from a computer screen for me.
As to why I asked, it was because I had twice in recent days seen the ^0.68 figure. I have no interest in fishing whatsoever, but one of them was on an angling website - God alone knows how I got there - and related to assessing the weight of a fish based on length and girth, each of which had a ^0.X attached to it. I wasn't too sure how one could multiply something by itself less than once...as it seemed to me!
My last maths lesson took place in 1956, so I've succeeded perfectly well in living for all but half a century without any mathematical knowledge beyond simple arithmetic. I have not even once used a quadratic equation in that time. And even when I had a log-book 'way back then, I was invariably on the cosine page when everybody else was on the tangent page (or whatever)!!
Thanks to all of you. Now I'll need to lie down for a while before getting down to trying to understand what you've told me. Then I'll try it out on the next halibut the lady brings home from Sainsbury's!
Well, I did exactly as I said yesterday and copied all your responses and read them through a line at a time a couple of times. I sort of understood at the time, though I wouldn't like to be tested on it today!
Given that I've reached my late sixties without the knowledge you all tried to impart, I can probably scrape through my remaining years without it, too.
However, perhaps one of you could expand on what Chris said about the calculator keys involved. As suspected, my own one did not have the 'funny' key, but I did find an online scientific calculator here Using that, I entered 5 and pressed the x-squared key which gave me the square root of 5. Thereafter, Chris said 0.68 had to be entered but, when I did that, nothing happened except that 0.68 appeared on the screen! I tried multiplying the square root of 5 by 0.68 and dividing it by 0.68 - madness, I know - but neither procedure produced the required number.
So, can anyone outline the complete keying sequence - in idiot-level words - for me, by reference to the online calculator mentioned above? Many thanks to whoever comes up with the goods but also to everyone else involved. Three stars all round...though I know Bernardo disapproves of them!
P.S. (if your mind is not boggling too much)
Did you know that you can also have something to the power of a negative number?!? For example:
10 ^ 3 = 1000
10 ^ 2 = 100
10 ^ 1 = 10
10 ^ 0 = 1
10 ^ -1 = 0.1
10 ^ -2 = 0.01
10 ^ -3 = 0.001
etc.
You will notice that
a to the power of minus b [ a ^ -b ]
is the same as
one over (a to the power of b) [ 1 / ( a ^ b ) ]