ChatterBank0 min ago
English Quake
The article itself is not very exciting, but read the comments underneath - come to think of it maybe this should be in CB.
http://uk.news.yahoo....hannel-094815785.html
http://uk.news.yahoo....hannel-094815785.html
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by wolf63. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.did you spot the mistake
>> This report then cites earlier quakes measuring: 4.3 in 1750; 4.5 in 1754; and 5.0 in 1878.
How could those earlier quakes be compared when the Richter scale didn't exist until Mr. Richter invented it in 1935? <<
the earlier quakes were on the great grandad richter scale which works them out in a different way
>> This report then cites earlier quakes measuring: 4.3 in 1750; 4.5 in 1754; and 5.0 in 1878.
How could those earlier quakes be compared when the Richter scale didn't exist until Mr. Richter invented it in 1935? <<
the earlier quakes were on the great grandad richter scale which works them out in a different way
A friend who lives in NZ has been reporting shakes and quakes on Facebook on an almost daily basis so i suppose we are relatively fortunate.
I was on the beach here in west sussex at lunchtime on my way to the office and there was no sign of the tsunami - just a sea too cold for a dip despite the sunshine, very disappointing - i really hate the climate here sometimes!
I was on the beach here in west sussex at lunchtime on my way to the office and there was no sign of the tsunami - just a sea too cold for a dip despite the sunshine, very disappointing - i really hate the climate here sometimes!