ChatterBank26 mins ago
who won the crusades?
was it the saracens or crusaders?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sith123. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.i guess they have traitors just as they do in war and peacetime....
So in this instance, Saracens won having managed to capture a Crusader.
http://www.skysports....12561_2425964,00.html
So in this instance, Saracens won having managed to capture a Crusader.
http://www.skysports....12561_2425964,00.html
The answer depends on what you want to believe as the evidence ccan be taken to 'prove' either outcome.
The faranji held onto parts of the Levant on and off for about 300 years - so they 'won' in those areas for that amount of time.
The Saracens regained territory in the same area over the same time - so they won in the same sense.
Both sides were so cream-crackered that they left the territory wide open to the Turks, so you could say the Ottoman Empir won.
The faranji held onto parts of the Levant on and off for about 300 years - so they 'won' in those areas for that amount of time.
The Saracens regained territory in the same area over the same time - so they won in the same sense.
Both sides were so cream-crackered that they left the territory wide open to the Turks, so you could say the Ottoman Empir won.
There is a huge discussion on the rights and wrongs of the whole thing - the Crusaders invaded the Holy Land in the first place to secure Jerusalem for Christianity. Look where it's got us - but Jerusalem is still acknowledged as a vital holy place for all three Abrahamic religions. In answer to the OP - I don't think anyone won.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.