News3 mins ago
Redressing the penalty balance
Newcastle were awarded a - let's say - dodgy penalty in their match against ManU yesterday.
But ManU have been awarded many soft penalties, particularly at Old Trafford, over the last decade or more so it's just these decisions balancing themselves out.
Who can argue with that?
But ManU have been awarded many soft penalties, particularly at Old Trafford, over the last decade or more so it's just these decisions balancing themselves out.
Who can argue with that?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bibblebub. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
The Press are saying that the FA will take a dim view of Sir Alex's rantings about the officials decision. I suppose there will be another suspension from the touchline or seeming else just as meaningless. When will these prima donna managers and players stop whingeing and accept that officials are human and occasionally make wrong calls(I don't know if it was right or wrong in this case). If the FA are serious about bringing discipline and respect back to the game, then the punishments should be point deductions. Owners and supporters would soon tire of the temperamental outbursts of their 'heroes'.
Just another reason for the introduction of technology. The argument that it would slow the game is rubbish.
During the resultant furore around the decision whilst the players approached the ref and surrounded him and the linesman, the 4th official had plenty of time to look at the decision via the TV cameras, it would have taken all of 20 seconds.
It doesn't need to be used for every decision, just those inside the penalty area that are contentious.
If a decision is disputed in general play (studs-up tackle and possible sending off etc) each team could be allowed say two appeals per half, similar to those given to cricket captains in LBW decisions.
Over the length of a season such decisions as yesterday's can result in winning or losing a title or relegation, which costs clubs millions either way, which is why technology needs to be introduced.
During the resultant furore around the decision whilst the players approached the ref and surrounded him and the linesman, the 4th official had plenty of time to look at the decision via the TV cameras, it would have taken all of 20 seconds.
It doesn't need to be used for every decision, just those inside the penalty area that are contentious.
If a decision is disputed in general play (studs-up tackle and possible sending off etc) each team could be allowed say two appeals per half, similar to those given to cricket captains in LBW decisions.
Over the length of a season such decisions as yesterday's can result in winning or losing a title or relegation, which costs clubs millions either way, which is why technology needs to be introduced.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.