Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Can Ponzi schemes exist without the greed of the "Investors"?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/...gland-london-17256318
Ok these guys are guilty of fraud but were it not for the greed of the punters they'd have nothing to "sell". Can you con an Honest man?
Ok these guys are guilty of fraud but were it not for the greed of the punters they'd have nothing to "sell". Can you con an Honest man?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by d9f1c7. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Well much of 'Finance' and modern stock trading revolves around creating money out of nowhere - which usually means out of someone else's pocket.
Sometimes it's really there - and sometimes it isn't.
People shouldn't gamble with more than they can afford to lose.
I have about as much sympathy for Investors as for Bookies and the Punters who prop up the wall in the local betting shop.
Sometimes it's really there - and sometimes it isn't.
People shouldn't gamble with more than they can afford to lose.
I have about as much sympathy for Investors as for Bookies and the Punters who prop up the wall in the local betting shop.
-- answer removed --
Let's get this straight- a Ponzi scheme, although debatedly illegal- is a very transparent thing and people DO earn huge amounts before they collapse, the problem is they always DO collapse, the trick is to know when to jump ship with your finds and not re-invest- hencethey always DO collapse. I don't think anyone was necassarily conned here- just lead by their own greed and as such have very little sympathy, but it largely depends how these two pitched it and who to.
And got their own way eventually didn't they ?
It seems if folk like myself lose money then that's expected and the risk we took. But if anyone else does, then it isn't fair, they can claim, and get all their stake back again. Particularly true in any situation where they can saddle the cost onto the taxpayer.
It seems if folk like myself lose money then that's expected and the risk we took. But if anyone else does, then it isn't fair, they can claim, and get all their stake back again. Particularly true in any situation where they can saddle the cost onto the taxpayer.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.