As though we haven't heard the last of unconvicted terrorists sue-ing us for a £1 apiece because of US torture we will now see victims or their families suffering casualties by US drone attacks demanding compensation via no win-no fee lawyers.
No one was a terrorist. These were a group of town elders having a meeting. We cocked up and told the Americans to murder the wrong people. We are not at war with Pakistan and the action was highly illegal on many levels. If Hague and the British Government are guilty (this trial will decide) then we should cough up. And be more careful in future.
The US seems to think so otherwise why lock them up in Cuba for many years. It was only to protect our secret services they couldn;t be brought to trial
SP, there are many unconvicted terrorists. Anyone involved in terroriism and not caught yest is an unconvicted terrorist so why is it a strange term?
To answer the question, as Gromit says we need to wait to see what comes out of the trial really to have the facts to comment. If we have made an error then yes, we have to pay up.
And it won't be the only claim. This is a test case! If this is successful just add the thousands of others caught up in drone strikes. Anyway the US is responsible for these drones, sue them!