Food & Drink5 mins ago
Chelski Power Station.....
Just read Chelsea want to build a new stadium in Battersea Power Station.
What about Stamford Bridge?
You can't just bulldoze 6 years of history.
What about Stamford Bridge?
You can't just bulldoze 6 years of history.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ELVIS68. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.To get back to the original question, Abramovich owns the club, the ground and eveything to do with it - with the exception of the freehold on the ground, the pitch and the name Chelsea FC. In an attempt to keep the club out of the hands of property developers, Ken Bates sold these to an organisation called Chelsea Pitch Owners in 1992 and any change will need 75% of the members to agree. Looks unlikely at the moment.
http://en.wikipedia.o.../Chelsea_Pitch_Owners
http://en.wikipedia.o.../Chelsea_Pitch_Owners
Big site, the unloved wreck of a power station will be removed, but getting there will not be easy. There's no tube station near it. Vauxhall tube is a healthy walk, and you can guess the physical condition of Chelsea fans; a twenty stone bloke in a Torres shirt is not an unusual sight at the Bridge. Otherwise it's a bus, which is unfeasible, or the overground trains, which will take a fair bit of time given that they're never as frequent as the tube's.
Earl's Court is a much better site; it's served by the adjacent Earl's Court tube station, designed to accommodate crowds for ther exhibition halls, which is where most fans go to now because they change there for the line to the tube station, Fulham Broadway, near the ground. Can't see Battersea being taken.
Earl's Court is a much better site; it's served by the adjacent Earl's Court tube station, designed to accommodate crowds for ther exhibition halls, which is where most fans go to now because they change there for the line to the tube station, Fulham Broadway, near the ground. Can't see Battersea being taken.
-- answer removed --
It seems, from the press, that the power station building is to be preserved. It must be very big site there. Fulham still has what is 'the cottage' of 'Craven Cottage', from when the site was part of the lands of a local bishop, but that's quite tiny. The Battersea buliding is enormous, roofless, and possessed of one fine room, originally part of the control rooms. Still, that would make a fine boardroom for Mr Abramovich, though knowing his taste, he may want the whole building for his personal space.
Don't why they don't just demolish it. It's now an eyesore, listed though it is, of no beauty or great significance. Mind, it was worse when it was operating: the window sills for miles around got deposits of soot !
Don't why they don't just demolish it. It's now an eyesore, listed though it is, of no beauty or great significance. Mind, it was worse when it was operating: the window sills for miles around got deposits of soot !
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.