ChatterBank1 min ago
Can The Americans Extrdite people from here even if they've never been there?
16 Answers
Perhaps I got something wrong, I must have missed something. This student, Richard O'Dwyer, has found links to places where people can watch films for free. The films were not on his website at all, he only learnt where they were by going to places such as google (perhaps), yahoo (perhaps), AB (perhaps) and because he is sharing where he found things now the americans say we're coming to get you? Is that right? Oh, and the kid placed on his own site which contained no pirated material at all, advertising...a bit like bloggers do through google, yahoo, etc...so the americans shut down his site, which was based here, begun extradition proceedings, and our courts say there's nothing we can do because we didn't read the small print in the contract? Oh and by the way, we can't do the same thing in america because americans have rights - they're a sovereign country. What have I missed? Is this REALLY going to happen? Will we soon start getting traffic fines from america should we have a ding with a car being driven by an american on holiday here? I'm really frustrated this morning because I'm sure I've missed something...Can anyone put my feeble mind to rest? Please!
Answers
read this - summarises the process in the 2003 Treaty
http:// www. bbc. co. uk/ news/ uk- politics- 16041824
21:23 Sun 29th Jan 2012
Yes they can extradite people from Britian for petty crimes that have never set foot on US soil- because our disgusting Govt cowtows to anything and everything America desires, because apparently we have a ' special relationship'- slightly like a warlord and his camp follower from what I can see of it.
I think I heard that the extradition arrangements we have with the USA were to be reviewed by our Government in the light of the absurdly biased balance of evidence required for a British person to be extradited to the USA in contrast to the vice-versa situation. BTW anyone know how the Garry McKinnon situation stands a the the moment ?
What caught my attention most was the news reader commented that whilst the americans can extradite in this manner, we cannot. That's what raised my eyebrows most of all. I hope that isn't true, but perhaps it is. It was also mentioned that this agreement materialised in the midst of the Iraq situation and was meant to expedite the movement of potential terrorists into the american's hands. To me, that's where it all becomes so opaque as I thought both they and we were simply doing this anyway as part of the 'rendering' process no one acknowledged. I'm just too naive I suppose.
read this - summarises the process in the 2003 Treaty
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16041824
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16041824
He gave people the means and the location to where illegal links were hosted.
It's a bit like you setting up a website where others link to the selling of class A drugs or guns etc. You may not be hosting the product but you are hosting the link and the means to get that product by others.
My first question to him would be 'what purpose was your website set up for?'
It's a bit like you setting up a website where others link to the selling of class A drugs or guns etc. You may not be hosting the product but you are hosting the link and the means to get that product by others.
My first question to him would be 'what purpose was your website set up for?'
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.