Only The A F D Can Save Germany
News2 mins ago
Answers
1 to 15 of 15
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Dumbo#1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I'd estimate that around 80% of the 'regulars', here in AB's technology section, use Firefox. (I'm one of them).
There are plenty of reasons why Firefox is better but it really comes down to a matter of personal choice. If you're considering trying Firefox, why not do so? You've nothing to lose; Firefox and IE7 can work side by side on your PC. (You can even have some pages open in IE7 and others open in Firefox simultaneously):
http://www.mozilla.com/
Chris
There are plenty of reasons why Firefox is better but it really comes down to a matter of personal choice. If you're considering trying Firefox, why not do so? You've nothing to lose; Firefox and IE7 can work side by side on your PC. (You can even have some pages open in IE7 and others open in Firefox simultaneously):
http://www.mozilla.com/
Chris
rojash, as usual, the Firefox brigade are shouting the loudest which is fine if you're going to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but....
I've been using Avant for some 4 years or so and it's been a tabbed browser for all of that time. hardly a skin for IE then when their tabbed browser has only just appeared.
What you really mean is that avant doesn't match up to the same standards as firefox in that it will display ALL web pages unlike firefox which only displays the ones that some geek decided weren't written in the right code?? Who cares? 99.9% of us don't and I dare bet that Dumbo#1 is one of us
I've been using Avant for some 4 years or so and it's been a tabbed browser for all of that time. hardly a skin for IE then when their tabbed browser has only just appeared.
What you really mean is that avant doesn't match up to the same standards as firefox in that it will display ALL web pages unlike firefox which only displays the ones that some geek decided weren't written in the right code?? Who cares? 99.9% of us don't and I dare bet that Dumbo#1 is one of us
camioneur: When rojash said that avast (and the others too) are just skins for IE, what he meant was that they use the same engine that IE uses to render and interface with websites. For this reason, Avast is no more secure than IE, and that means that it isn't that secure at all.
And yes of course, you're right. End users shouldn't have to care at all about what code has been used to create the website. However, it just bugs us that they're too lazy to write code that works everywhere, and no just in IE.
Note that this isn't an IE vs. firefox thing. It's a IE vs. everything else thing. Suppose a site only works properly in IE. You seem to think this doesn't matter and people should just stop complaining and use IE. However, not everyone uses IE. Hell, many people don't use Windows at all. IE wasn't the first browser, and for a good few years of the web Microsoft had no interest in it. It was only when they reaslised there was a lot of money in it that they did a 180 and made IE and msn etc.
And yes of course, you're right. End users shouldn't have to care at all about what code has been used to create the website. However, it just bugs us that they're too lazy to write code that works everywhere, and no just in IE.
Note that this isn't an IE vs. firefox thing. It's a IE vs. everything else thing. Suppose a site only works properly in IE. You seem to think this doesn't matter and people should just stop complaining and use IE. However, not everyone uses IE. Hell, many people don't use Windows at all. IE wasn't the first browser, and for a good few years of the web Microsoft had no interest in it. It was only when they reaslised there was a lot of money in it that they did a 180 and made IE and msn etc.
-- answer removed --
1 to 15 of 15
