ChatterBank6 mins ago
If you can't measure it objectively ...
13 Answers
The Olympic Motto is Citius, Altius, Fortius (faster/higher/stronger) ... which implies that you should be able to accurately measure and/or objectively decide who has won. So athletics, swimming, boxing etc are obviously OK.
But what about activities which are wholly 'subjective' in their assessment of excellence?
I have no problem understanding the beauty and physicality of (say) the gymnastics - but is it truly an Olympic sport?
But what about activities which are wholly 'subjective' in their assessment of excellence?
I have no problem understanding the beauty and physicality of (say) the gymnastics - but is it truly an Olympic sport?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sunny-dave. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I don't think there are many sports that require more strength than our gynmasts on their various apparatus.
It would be easier of they didn't have to rely on a judges score I agree but it doesn't make it any less of a sport. Lets be honest, they are stronger and more athletic than the archers for example. (Nothing against archers, everyone in the games deserves to be there, I'm just using them in a defensive argument!)
It would be easier of they didn't have to rely on a judges score I agree but it doesn't make it any less of a sport. Lets be honest, they are stronger and more athletic than the archers for example. (Nothing against archers, everyone in the games deserves to be there, I'm just using them in a defensive argument!)
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.