Law5 mins ago
In a negligence case if it is no answer for an adult defendant to say that he is unsually inexperienced or slow-witted, why is it an answer for a child defedant to say that he is only fifteen?
4 Answers
In a negligence case if it is no answer for an adult defendant to say that he is unsually inexperienced or slow-witted, why is it an answer for a child defedant to say that he is only fifteen?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by lorenia2012. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.you don't give many details to go on, but i would make a guess (and it's only that) that an adult is expected to assume a certain level of competence before undertaking something, and do what another reasonable person would do while a fifteen year old would only be expected to do what other 15 year olds would do
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.