Kate topless ....

[andy-hughes]

It's reported that a magazine in France is to print photos of the Duchess of Cambridge sunbathing topless, while on holiday.

I think the Duchless is a lovely young woman, but I have no special desire to see pictures of her topless taken from a long way away.

My curiosity is - who would? So the DOC has breasts - shock horror! If anyone wants to see semi-naked ladies, we have a national paper here which prints a pic every single day.

I am utterly unable to see why anyone would be remotely interetested in these photos - but some people must be, hence the publcation.

Anyone know anyone who would buy this mag - or similar?

[jomifl]

It's all a storm in a B cup, probably a bit of photoshopping, who could prove it either way.

[joeluke]

Very attractive woman, body like a stick insect so any topless pictures wouldn't exactly show a lot

[ichkeria]

Serves them both right for not inviting Brown and Blair to their wedding :-)

[ll_billym]

I searched and found the pictures on the internet, just out of curiosity really and because it's not every day you get to see a duchesses boobs so I thought I'd take the opportunity seeing as it was there.

joeluke:- Surprisingly more than 'not a lot' but point taken, not exactly Page 3.

It's done now and whether I saw them or not makes no difference to how she or anybody else feels about it.

[mellymell]

Well personally I think it's all a storm in a T cup.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMzGdITmfEc

[Twenty20]

She may have been on private property but the photographer was on a public road which makes a big difference. If she's silly enough to strip off in view of a public road (albeit some distance from the road) then she can hardly complain afterwards if people have seen her topless. She, or one of her advisers, should have been aware of this.

I think she/they are being rather naive about this. She's obviously in the spotlight, she was surely aware of this when she married a prince. Whether the magazine should have printed the photos is a different matter but , even if they didn't, they would still have ended up on the web for all to see.

Unfortunately, she's brought it on herself. Silly girl. She needs to think before she acts rather than the other way round.

[FredPuli43]

It turns out that the photos were probably taken from 600 metres away,from a public road, which makes the innocence of the Duchess a little more understandable; you'd need be peculiarly aware to think of the road at all, let alone that good shots could be taken from it at that distance. The Times picture editor identified that site from 3 possible ones shown on satellite pictures. The other two were 390 and 500 metres away, but not as good for photography.