Christmas7 mins ago
what has happened to Mr Assange in his Ecquadorian "hotel"/
9 Answers
as per the title?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by DTCwordfan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.well is he still there? - or does the absence of news mean that he has scarpered (back to Australia)?
I heard something that the Swedes had rescinded their request for extradition. Is this true and, if so, what a waste of bloody money, effort and diplomatic goodwill on our part? And are we claiming compensation from Stockholm?
I heard something that the Swedes had rescinded their request for extradition. Is this true and, if so, what a waste of bloody money, effort and diplomatic goodwill on our part? And are we claiming compensation from Stockholm?
The Boeing 727 was hijacked in February 2000 in Afghanistan and flown to Stansted in Essex. The nine men were convicted in December 2001 and sentenced to between 30 and 60 months but were freed on appeal two years later when the Court of Appeal found they were acting under duress.
Despite an immigration panel ruling saying the men should not be sent back, the Home Office refused to give them permission to stay but in May 2006 a High Court judge angrily accused the Home Office of an "abuse of power" by ignoring its own laws and ordered ministers to pay the highest possible legal costs. The then Prime Minister Tony Blair said that decision was "an abuse of common sense" and an appeal against the decision was launched. That appeal was lost and Home Secretary John Reid said "I continue to believe that those whose actions have undermined any legitimate claim to asylum should not be granted leave to remain in the UK. I plan to bring forward legislation to do this as part of the early bill to strengthen our immigration laws."
Needless to say no such legislation was introduced and the nine men are still here.
Despite an immigration panel ruling saying the men should not be sent back, the Home Office refused to give them permission to stay but in May 2006 a High Court judge angrily accused the Home Office of an "abuse of power" by ignoring its own laws and ordered ministers to pay the highest possible legal costs. The then Prime Minister Tony Blair said that decision was "an abuse of common sense" and an appeal against the decision was launched. That appeal was lost and Home Secretary John Reid said "I continue to believe that those whose actions have undermined any legitimate claim to asylum should not be granted leave to remain in the UK. I plan to bring forward legislation to do this as part of the early bill to strengthen our immigration laws."
Needless to say no such legislation was introduced and the nine men are still here.
Just came across this today :
http:// uk.news .yahoo. ...swed en-0145 19397.h tml
http://
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.