As one who was glad that there was the signing of a Covenant, mainly because I would have had no desire to have my background subsumed into what was then an aggresively monotheisitic monocultural Ireland, (although I readily acknowledge that it has moved on greatly and I love the time I spend there now), I can see such a lot of sense in ichkerias post. As always, there are two sides to every story.
The marchers march regardless and religion clouds so many issues. There is also the issue of people travelling vast distances to be "offended" by marches, as the arrest sheets at most contentious marches show. They should be hammered by the courts for fomenting trouble. If a march in Lurgan offended me I would stay in Belfast, yet people from Lurgan were arrested at Ardoyne not all that long ago.
The religion issue also annoys me as I have experienced all too many morons on both sides espousing their views despite not being religious in the slightest, yet all to readily using religion to "justify" their arguments. You can't have it both ways kids?
The issue of bands stopping/serending outside churches is a strange one. If there are people worshipping in the church at the time then I would arrest every singe band member/marcher. However, if the church is empty, so what? It is an empty building and, as long as it is not in a republican/nationalist/catholic/call it what you will area, where is the harm?
We are, however, as sandy pointed out earlier, united in poverty, both financial and of ambition.
Finally, "William of Orange wasn't even English"???? Glad you pointed that out but who is going to tell the marchers?