Yes, Ich, I'm well aware of the difference between transitive and intransitive verbs. However, in the circumstances we're discussing, it did nor seem to me to be too great a 'leap' from one usage to the other, given what we all know about language's constant tendency to evolve.
I agree that the advert gets it utterly wrong, Ellipsis, but Sir Humphrey Davy who discovered aluminium in 1807 originally called it 'alumium' without an 'ni', before altering it to ‘alumina’ and then changing it yet again to 'aluminum' still without the second 'i'. Later, the editor of a British scientific journal changed it to 'aluminium' "in preference,” he said, “to aluminum which has a less classical sound." Presumably he wanted it to chime with sodium, potassium, chromium etc.
However, it has to be said that the man who discovered it finally called it exactly what the AMERICANS now call it, not what WE call it! The supposedly “missing 'i'" British people often refer to didn't GO... in fact, it CAME! So who’s really right, those who accept the discoverer’s nomenclature or those who accept an obscure magazine editor’s nomenclature?
But still…the advert is ghastly!