@Andy - Not sure I quite follow your most recent posts on this Andy - there seems to be some sort of dissonance there.
As a starting point, you say that you are an atheist, with no hedging of bets. OK, fair enough. But then you qualify that statement, and effectively rebut yourself by offering the "Pascals Wager" argument as a kind of backstop.
The point about Pascals Wager was essentially, a theistic apologistic stance - that the argument is that you were better off espousing a faith in god, just in case there actually was one, and that way you might avoid eternal damnation. Essentially, an argument for theism, and the epitome of "hedging your bets".
Do you not find this position at odds with your statement that you are an atheist with no "hedging of bets"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_Wager